Answer: d. Entire initial investment will not be recovered.
Explanation:
The Payback period by definition is the amount of time it will take a Project to recover the initial investment into it. For example, if a project had an investment of $20 million and made $5 million every year, the Payback period would be 4 years.
Now, if the amount of time it will take to recover an investment is longer than the expected amount of time the project will run (expected useful life) then logically speaking that would mean that the Investment would not be entirely recovered because the project will be done before it can pay off the investment hence Option D is correct.
Hello,
Here is your answer:
The proper answer is option A "true". It is extremely important to find the source of the information because the source could not be verified (which means its giving false information).
Your answer is A.
If you need anymore help feel free to ask me!
Hope this helps!
Answer and Explanation:
In the given case, the second will would be destroyed non-intentionally by the testatrix that represent the person who writes the will. Also the second will would have be intended to revoke the first will
In addition to this, Testatrix intends the second will to be value also at the same time she dont want the first will to be probated
So the second will would be upheld because of testamentary motive.
Answer:
Here are some changes to the textbook requirements that will simplify your work somewhat.
· The transaction requirements give you information on required tables. (page 339-340)
· Assume that ALL orders ship entirely, in other words there are no partial shipments. Either they ship the entire order or they wait until they have all the required units and then ship.
· Do not include the Customer PO information
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is dominating.
Explanation:
Generally, different definitions of "social conflict" are offered, differences that call our attention to complementary aspects of the concept: For example, Stephen Robbins: "A process that begins when one party perceives that another has affected it negatively or that It is about to negatively affect some of its interests ”2 and that of Lewis A. Sew for whom the social conflict is a struggle for values and for the status, power and scarce resources, in the course of which opponents want to neutralize, damage or eliminate their rivals. A conflict will be social when it transcends the individual and comes from the structure of society itself.
