Answer:
Your stock will be valued in $20,838.
Explanation:
If there are no taxes, it is expected that the value of the stock will lower the amount of the dividend. That means
Stock price (April 19) = stock price - dividend = 93-2.4=90.6 $/share
In this case, your stock of 230 shares will be valued as
Stock value = Stock share * stock price = 230 shares * $90.6/share
Stock value = $ 20,838
Your stock will be valued in $20,838.
<span>The
national do not call registry was created to give americans a tool for
maintaining their privacy on home telephone lines. More than 60 percent of all households are registered.</span>
Answer:
specialty store
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that for this you would most likely choose a specialty store. This refers to a retail business that focuses on very unique and specific product categories, in which everything revolves around that category. This category may be unique but offer a wide variety of product offering within it.
Answer: Deficit; higher; a decrease
Explanation:
<em>The term crowding-out effect refers to a situation in which a government </em><em><u>deficit</u></em><em> results in</em><em><u> higher</u></em><em> interest rates, causing </em><em><u>a decrease</u></em><em> in private spending on investment and consumer durables.</em>
The Crowding-out effect is what happens when a Government increases its spending past its revenues and gets a budget deficit. In other to balance its books therefore it will borrow heavily.
If the Government is such a large one like the American Government or the British Government, the borrowing might be so large that it will have the effect of reducing the amount of loanable funds in the market thereby increasing the interest rates due to a reduced supply of loanable funds.
As there are now increased interest rates, it will be more expensive for companies to borrow to spend on investment or for consumers to spend on durables. It will have the effect of <em>crowding out</em> the private sector.
Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
