Answer:
Explanation:
Hercule Poirot was making a comparison on how a train ride had the same dangers of a sea voyage. If we think and see every single detail it does have their similarities. They both are massive transportation machines that are capable of handling a large amount of people within their parameters. That means that for a certain amount of time you are "stuck" with the same people and unable to go anywhere else. In consequence, if something bad happens on the ride then there is going to be a 50/50 chance in everything. If it's the case of being the person who is hurt or being the person who is hurting people. Those are the types of dangers the passengers may have.
Your answer for your question is the letter D!
The question above wants to analyze your ability to interpret a text and a character. This interpretation should be based on your personal way of analyzing a character. For that reason, I can't write this review for you, but I'll show you how to write it.
First of all, it is important for you to know that Beowulf is the main character of the epic "Beowulf" so to answer your question you should read the entire epic and reread it if necessary for you to understand this character.
To expedite this analysis and reading, you can search for articles that discuss how the character, Beowulf, was constructed and what he represents. These articles can be found on online research tools and literary platforms.
As you read, you will need to answer the following questions to conclude whether Beowulf is, in fact, something:
- Does Beowulf perform heroic acts?
- Does Beowulf display noble behavior?
- Does Beowulf have a noble bloodline?
- Is Beowulf a strong character?
- Is Beowulf ambitious?
- Is this ambition used for good?
- What does Beowulf's behavior say about him?
These questions must be answered with parts of the epic, which are the parts you will present to confirm your conclusion about Beowulf.
More information on the link:
brainly.com/question/577189?referrer=searchResults
C). Personification
Because the stormy life can’t actually draw
<u>O way it handles things on streets</u>
Explanation:
There is a needless ambiguity in this phrase that would just confuse the reader. it is not good prose when you can use just as many words and explain what the problem is but instead just use the word 'things' to describe them.
<u>The sentence begs to understand what exactly it is that the car does not understand on the road or has a difficulty to follow but this is left unanswered in the text of the paragraph.</u>
So this is where the author must re question their word choice for the passage.
