1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tasya [4]
3 years ago
13

César Chávez said that he learned a lot from Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. Which of their strategies did Chávez adopt?

History
2 answers:
ad-work [718]3 years ago
8 0
It's A 100% sure. L<span>eading hunger strikes, marches, and boycotts of crops</span>
puteri [66]3 years ago
4 0
The correct answer is A: leading hunger strikes, marches, and boycotts of crops.
Cesar Chavez was a civil rights activists for farmers and is widely recognized as one of the most famous Hispanic-American activists. He routinely went on fasts or hunger strikes like Gandhi did, to attract public attention to certain problems. He also organized boycotts and strikes like Martin Luther King Jr, to protest against  pesticides and unfair labor laws. Cesar Chavez helped co-found the National Farm Association. He was majorly popular within the Hispanic community, especially on the west coast where many farmers were Mexican-American.
You might be interested in
Why did slavery begin in Virginia?
Anna [14]
There was a need for agricultural workers.

Tobacco was in Hugh demand in Europe and England. So Virginia developer the commodity crop of Tabasco and needed labor to tend to the crop. This led to an increase in the importation of African Slaves into the Colony.

I hope this helps! (^_^)
3 0
3 years ago
3) Is historical revisionist text important in the way we learn our history? How so?
Margaret [11]

Answer:

Explanation:In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account.[1] It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or time-span or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.

At a basic level, legitimate historical revisionism is a common and not especially controversial process of developing and refining the writing of histories. Much more controversial is the reversal of moral findings, whereby what mainstream historians had considered (for example) positive forces are depicted as negative. Such revisionism, if challenged (especially in heated terms) by the supporters of the previous view, can become an illegitimate form of historical revisionism known as historical negationism if it involves inappropriate methods such as:

the use of forged documents or implausible distrust of genuine documents

attributing false conclusions to books and sources

manipulating statistical data

deliberately mis-translating texts

This type of historical revisionism can present a re-interpretation of the moral meaning of the historical record.[2] Negationists use the term "revisionism" to portray their efforts as legitimate historical revisionism. This is especially the case when "revisionism" relates to Holocaust denial.

8 0
3 years ago
What is proposed legislation called? A) a bill B) a Proposed law C) standing law D) claim
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

the answer is Deep) claim

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Solve for x. Enter your answer in the box.
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

x= 132

Explanation:

The sum of all interior angles is (n-2)x180 while n=number of sides. So (6-2)x180=720. The angles you have add up to 588. All you need to do now is 720-588.

6 0
3 years ago
If a president were to declare a “ hands off” policy, what do you think he might be describing
Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

Hands off policy would be described as the policy that means not intervening in matters.

If a president has announced an off hands policy in some matter, that means he has declared that he will not intervene in that matter under any circumstance. He would have nothing to do with it and nobody shall try to have him indulged in that matter.

I hope the answer was helpful.

Thanks for asking.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which country was mostly made up of many ethnic minorities
    15·2 answers
  • This is a process, invention or method to interact with society, the environment or material objects
    12·2 answers
  • According the table above name one aspect of American life that worsened between 1870 and 1910
    14·1 answer
  • What were the beliefs that define Christianity
    10·1 answer
  • How did the defeat of the boxer rebellion weaken the dynasty?
    9·1 answer
  • how would you define the term "massacre"? How many people have to die in order for an event to be called a "massacre".
    6·1 answer
  • Why did Boston colonists and British soldiers clash at the Boston massacre?
    8·1 answer
  • Which abolitionist was against sending blacks back to Africa?
    12·1 answer
  • What three things did trade unions want to be improved for their workers?
    7·2 answers
  • Phonics: Short Vowels
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!