The repeal of national Prohibition in 1933 showed that "<span>(4) unpopular laws are difficult to enforce" since drinking was very popular and people continued to do it. </span>
The Dawes act<span> was yet another attempt to force us into assimilation, which we </span>did<span> not want. </span>The dawes act<span> allowed the take over of indian
</span>
Answer:
Ethical and religious conflict defies sovereignty because it is such a violent confrontation that it sometimes leads to extremist actions that violate the provisions of the War Code and can lead to the genocide of the population.
Explanation:
The term Ethnic Conflict identifies any conflict that has in its essence the clash of people with religious, racial, cultural or geographical origins. Violent confrontation is always present and sometimes actions are so extreme that they violate the provisions of the War Code. This is the case of genocide, which brings to the death thousands or millions of people, without distinction between civilians and military, men, women or children. In some cases, especially in the Middle East, the term Religious Conflict is used instead of Ethnic Conflict because the religious motives are much more prominent in relation to the others.
The Dred Scott Supreme Court case ruled that slaves are property and are allowed in all states/territories, even if slavery is outlawed in the state constitution.
This idea supports the concept of nullification, as states that abolished slavery would nullify (refuse) to follow this ruling because they felt it was unconstitutional.
This idea also limited the power of the federal government to restrict the expansion of slavery because the court ruled that slaves do not have legal rights and are considered property no matter where they go. This meant that slavery can essentially exist anywhere in the US and the federal government couldn't change that unless they made a national law/amendment that outlawed slavery.
