Both terms describe a way of recounting something that may have been said – but there is a subtle difference between them.
Direct speech describes when something is being repeated exactly as it was – usually in between a pair of inverted commas. For example:
She told me, “I’ll come home by 10pm.”
Indirect speech will still share the same information – but instead of expressing someone’s comments or speech by directly repeating them, it involves reporting or describing what was said. An obvious difference is that with indirect speech, you won’t use inverted commas. For example:
She said to me that she would come home by 10pm.
Direct speech can be used in virtually every tense in English.
Indirect speech is used to report what someone may have said, and so it is always used in the past tense. Instead of using inverted commas, we can show that someone’s speech is being described by using the word “that” to introduce the statement first.
Answer:
The paragraph uses past-, present-, and future-tense verbs. It contains four infinitives.
I think that it would be protection. If he wears a helmet and watches out for traffic, there is a lower risk of him being run over or hurting himself badly when he falls of his bike. If he is mindful of pedestrians and uses hand signals, there is less of a chance that he will hit a pedestrian which could result in one or both of them getting hurt.
Answer: UK. That's where my girlfriend is. And the language spoken in the question is Japanese.
Answer:
Slaves kept their African heritage alive by telling stories of their ancestors.
Slaves had to live where their owners told them to.
Slaves could be bought and sold at market.
Explanation:
