1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
notsponge [240]
3 years ago
12

Which of the following was not a cause for world war II?

History
2 answers:
kotegsom [21]3 years ago
8 0
An alliance was formed between Germany and the untied states
Brrunno [24]3 years ago
6 0
Hitler’s armies invaded Poland in 1939
You might be interested in
A country would most likely adopt a market economy if it wanted to
igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

Make sure prices of goods and services are set by supply and demand .

Explanation:

The economies of the United States and other countries, such as Japan, are based on capitalism. ... Decisions regarding investment and the use of the means of production are determined by competing business owners in the marketplace. Production takes place within the process of capital accumulation.

Countries that have a market economy are Mexico, United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Canada . These countries have a market economy because the prices of goods and services are set by supply and demand .

3 0
4 years ago
A que refiere el significado de un argumento y necesidad de argumentos
alisha [4.7K]
Deberían ser una imagen adjunta a tu pregunta o no?
7 0
3 years ago
Selection 2.4 is called Confucius “thumbnail autobiography”. Write your own version based on your life so far?
seropon [69]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What was an economic cause of the French Revolution
arlik [135]
The country of France was in severe debt after helping to finance the American Revolution. Also, food shortages, especially bread, led to inflation of prices in the years just before the French Revolution broke out. (See image: Courtesy of weebly.com)

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why can’t America have a completely open border
saveliy_v [14]

Answer:

America cannot have a completely open border, for then there will be no "United States of America". A nation is defined by it's borders, and for it to be a sovereign nation, there must be a border, as well as guards to the border. In the case of opening the borders, you are essentially not only taking away the sovereignty of the nation, but also taking away from the very definition of a nation, "a large body of people united by common..., inhabiting a particular

land".  Without a border, without protection, without those who want to continue to help the US grow as a nation, America will not survive. In fact, no country will survive, as their benevolence will lead to structural & internal collapse.

~

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the process of urbanization and how it affected the country.
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME!!!! I NEED HELP QUICK!! What was one main reason why slave trading greatly expanded beginning around the 1500s? A
    8·1 answer
  • Not everyone in Texas and the South supported the Confederacy and the Civil War. Who in the South showed opposition to the Confe
    12·1 answer
  • Mississippi, New Mexico, and Louisiana have the highest percentage of their population in poverty according to the Statistical A
    8·1 answer
  • A group of nomads have stopped moving to follow herds of deer because they have figured out how to farm and grow crops. They wil
    13·1 answer
  • Which of these is a branch of the United States Government?
    9·2 answers
  • Who took over, destroyed the city, and exiled the people of Judah to Babylon?
    13·2 answers
  • Plss help me and i will mark u as brainliest and my other maths questions ​please
    13·1 answer
  • What are some ancient greek sports in modern day olympics
    15·1 answer
  • Can you guys help me with this? pls?<br><br><br> I-i rlly don't understand...​
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!