Answer:
*hmph* idk have someone else help you :/ sowy
Explanation:
I DONT KNOW I DONT KNOW I DONT KNOW I DONT KNOW I DONT KNOW I DONT KNOW I DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOWI DONT KNOW
There were over 38 million and 17 million death 20 million wound
An entrepreneur who took over and expanded a family business begun by his father is: A. Joseph Unahue.
<h3>Who is an entrepreneur?</h3>
An entrepreneur can be defined as an individual who is involved in the buying and selling of goods and services usually from scratch or in a small capacity.
<h3>Who is
Joseph Unahue?</h3>
Joseph Andrew Unanue was born on 14th of March, 1925 in Brooklyn, New York, United States of American to his Spanish parents who were the founder of Goya Foods.
In the mid-1970s Joseph Unahue became the president of Goya Foods, which is the largest Hispanic-owned food company in the United States of America.
In conclusion, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that Joseph Andrew Unanue was an entrepreneur who took over and expanded a family business which was started by his father.
Read more on Joseph Unahue here: brainly.com/question/14425663
#SPJ1
Answer:
What does the fifth amendment protect?
The Fifth Amendment protects the right to avoid incriminating yourself. A defendant can plead the Fifth Amendment if a lawyer asks a question that the defendant would incriminate himself or herself by answering truthfully.
Explanation:
Constitutional Issue ★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★
The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution guarantees that “no person . . . shall be
compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. . . .” This right was made
part of the Bill of Rights to prevent a tyrannical government from forcing accused persons
to confess to crimes they may or may not have committed. Miranda’s case before the
Supreme Court was based on this Fifth Amendment protection. The Court accepted the
case in order to explore and clarify certain problems arising from earlier decisions related
to the rights of individuals taken into police custody. The precise question that the Court
explored was under what circumstances an interrogation may take place so that a confession made during the interrogation would be constitutionally admissible in a court of law.
★★★★★★★