1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zzz [600]
3 years ago
11

In the late 1800s, there were several battles between the U.S. Army and the Great Plains Indians. One of the most famous was the

Battle of Little Big Horn. Battles like this were fought because A. the government was forcing Indians onto reservations. B. the U.S. Government owed money to the native tribes. C. tribes of the Great Plains were naturally warlike. D. native tribes had attacked a white settlement.
History
1 answer:
Serjik [45]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A. the government was forcing Indians onto reservations.

Explanation:

Before the Battle of Little Big Horn, George Custer, the commander of the United States troops against the Great Plain Indians, was given the order to send all the Indians (particularly Cheyenne and Sioux ) in that region to reservations area around 1876.

However, many of these Indians refused to move, as a result, a war ensued between the US government and the Indians.

Hence, it can be concluded that Battles like this were fought because "the government was forcing Indians onto reservations"

You might be interested in
Was admiral t Mahan supporting imperialist
Mamont248 [21]
Yes Alfred Thayer Mahan supported imperialist
5 0
3 years ago
Which feature of the U.S government is based on the principle of federalism
Liono4ka [1.6K]

The division of powers between the federal government and the states

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is health insurance the responsibility of the government to provide?
Inessa05 [86]
No it’s your choice if you want to use it or not
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was the conduct of the United States during WWII<br> consistent with its values?
lora16 [44]

Answer: Yes

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does the marriage of a same-sex couple truly threaten heterosexual marriages and families? Explain.
Alisiya [41]

Answer:

No, it does not.

Explanation: Same-sex couples do not truly threaten heterosexual marriages and families because they are just like the rest of society. They are just people in love like heterosexual people and their love doesn't affect anyone. Two men or two women being married doesn't stop a heterosexual couple from having kids or getting married, does it?

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The holocaust, which was a terrible tragedy, killed millions of people of different ethnicities as well as those who were lgbq,
    6·2 answers
  • GOVERNMENT:
    6·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP. NEED ANSWERS ASAP. THANK YOU.
    13·2 answers
  • How has advertising changed with the flood of goods?
    10·1 answer
  • Which organization created the euro?
    5·2 answers
  • As you should have read in the lesson materials, the reality of cowboy life was different from the image portrayed in popular cu
    7·2 answers
  • How many lines of symmetry does a square have? 1 4 2 0
    11·1 answer
  • Match the following countries with their alliance.
    11·1 answer
  • ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST! Why should citizens be the authors of society's laws, according to Rousseau?
    5·1 answer
  • Would u rather spend time with God or spend time with Saitan??​
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!