Answer:
I would agree with those who worry that distance learning will replace traditional learning experiences.
This is because though distance learning allows for greater coverage and accessibility of learning, it also foregoes the physical and social aspects of being physically present for classes.
Explanation:
While there is definitely some advantage of distance learning, there is nothing that is at par with a traditional form of learning, Distance learning may make learning more accessible for many people from diverse backgrounds. It also makes it possible for the spread of learning, the possibility for those in the remotest parts of the country to be able to get the same learning as others.
But at the same time, there is the issue of learning on-site. Traditional forms of learning make the learner be present for the actual class and also be socially involved in any of the learning processes. I'm not saying that distance learning does not have any activities for social interaction between the students. But traditional learning system requires the students to go to college, interact with others, work on things together, and be 'present' physically and mentally. Despite what others and many may think, I still prefer the traditional learning experience over distance education. And so, I would side with the students who worry about traditional learning being replaced by distance learning.
Answer:
When we got to the house we entered an obscure corridor and began to find our way up a dark and narrow staircase
Explanation:
it is a gloomy dark place in yours it is evil ship-carpenter
<span>After a stint in the US Army, Kim entered college, said his brother.</span>
If a person arrives on US soil and claims asylum, does the US have to deal with their claim under international law? Yes. Not only does the US have an international legal obligation to do so, based on the requirement of complying with the object and purpose of the 1951 Refugee Convention, and implementing legal obligations in good faith, it has an obligation to do so under its own domestic law.
The executive order cannot displace domestic legal obligations. So those who, with great difficulty, manage to reach the US will have to have their asylum claims examined. The duty not to return a person to a state where they may face torture or other serious harms is absolute under the UN’s Convention Against Torture. The US has signed and ratified this convention.
However, with the likely increase in asylum detention of people crossing the US-Mexico border that will arise from one of Trump’s earlier executive orders, there is potential for decisions on whether a person is a refugee being made in an exceptionally tight time frame. It’s possible that, more generally, asylum decisions will be rushed through and the law not properly adhered to.
Under international law, can the US ban asylum seekers from certain countries?
Under international law, the US cannot ban asylum seekers from certain countries. The US has signed and ratified a number of international treaties that prohibit religious and race discrimination in the operation of legal systems, and this extends to operating a migration system in line with international non-discrimination protections.