This is correct, because aerobic is more efficient than anaerobic, making it preferable. Cellular respiration is energetically more efficient than anaerobic respiration.
<h3>Cellular respiration and anaerobic respiration </h3>
Cellular respiration refers to the generation of energy in the form of ATP in presence of oxygen.
Conversely, anaerobic respiration generates energy (ATP) in absence of oxygen.
Cellular respiration is an energetically more efficient pathway than anaerobic respiration, thereby facultative organisms generate ATP by cellular respiration when it is possible.
Learn more about cellular respiration here:
brainly.com/question/2809259
Answer:
The situation in which some individuals have greater reproductive success than other individuals in a population. Along with variation and heritability, it is one of the three conditions necessary for evolution by natural selection.
There are so many factors that contributed to this over time, reproductive success differs and it could be attributed to hereditary and variation as well. Most often, the hereditary plays the most role out of all as the viability of both eggs and sperms could have been inherited from parents or being affected as a result of environmental factor or nutrition or other factors.
For instance, if one has a rhesus factor of negative and went ahead to marry another male counterpart with negative rhesus factor, this sedomly leads to miscarriage which could have been controlled had it been they were thoroughly counseled. Furthermore, physical factor such as accident could damage one spermatical vessicles that houses the sperm cells which render such an individual to be unable to donate a viable sperm cell for reproduction.
Those with high rate of reproductive success thrives as result of having many offspring which increases their chances of having more offspring than those with little success rate.
Explanation:
We can confirm that the reintroduction of the wolf to the ecosystem would most likely cause a decline in the population of coyotes.
<h3>Why would this cause a decline in the population of coyotes?</h3>
The wolf, in most ecosystems, is considered to be the top predator. This means that it will also hunt and consume the coyotes. This alone would cause a decline in the coyote population as they now have an additional predator hunting them. Also, the wolves would be competing with the coyotes for food sources, furthering the impact on the coyote population.
Therefore, we can confirm that the reintroduction of the wolf to the ecosystem would most likely cause a decline in the population of coyotes.
To learn more about ecosystems visit:
brainly.com/question/1673533?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ1
Answer:
Lion populations are found all over Sub-Saharan Africa showing genetic similar lions live in same geographic areas as the DNA strands are similar to each other and they can be related to each other.
It means lions with genetic similarity can be present in the same geographic area as Lion populations are found all over Sub-Saharan Africa.
Answer:
Nature
Explanation:
Because erosion happens in the nature.
