Both sparked controversy on a political front by bringing new opportunities for political parties to gain more power. Think of the new territory as a way for a weaker side of politics to gain more power in the government.
You should probably use these evidences/terms in your answer:
-North/South/West
-Tariffs
-Expansion, Westward and farmland
-rising tensions/sectionalism
Considering the situation described above, this is a <u>Macro-level approach</u>, and the theoretical approach to sociology <em>Durkheim</em> was using is <u>Structural Functionalism.</u>
<h3>What is a Macro-Level Approach in Sociology?</h3>
The <em><u>macro-level approach</u></em> or theory assesses how the entire society or community interacts, usually between the components such as people and the environments.
Similarly, <u>Structural </u><u>Functionalism</u> is one of the <em><u>Macro-Level</u></em> Approaches that focus on society and its components.
Given that Durkheim focused on the way each segment of society does its part, as members of a team, this is an example of Structural Functionalism.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Durkheim used <em><u>Structural Functionalism</u></em> to understand his study, a form of <em><u>Macro-Level approach</u></em>.
Learn more about Macro-Level Approach here: brainly.com/question/8202286
The answer would be Consumer choices.
Because every county has a different way of believing the same things like Islam the people are *muslim* but the basically believe the exact same thing as Jews and Christians.
I hope I helped alot :p
