There weren’t really established governments at the time. each nation had their own way of ruling over their people. e.g, china had a burreacy, europe was ruled by absolute monarchs, and the islamic world had caliphs or sultans depending on the region
The right of access to the courts is indeed but one aspect of the <u>right to petition.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
When the constitution is looked into, it is revealed that the right to access to the courts is nothing but one of the aspects of the First Amendment’s right to petition the government for redress of one’s grievances. This can be easily seen as it is stated here, similar philosophy governs the approach of groups or citizens to administrative agencies which can both be seen as creatures of the legislature, and limbs of the executive, and to all the courts which are the third branch of the government.
Thus, it is more than implied that the right of petition is extended to all departments of the government including the courts. Thus, making it an aspect of the "right to petition".
D is false I know for sure because FDR's administration was the one that created the New Deal.
A is true.
I don't think B is right.
I'm not too sure about C either. I know that he got support from Progressives in Congress but I'm not sure that he got the reforms from them.
Answer:
Charlemagne served as a source of inspiration for such leaders as Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821) and Adolf Hitler (1889-1945), who had visions of ruling a unified Europe.
Explanation:
Charlemagne (c.742-814), also known as Karl and Charles the Great, was a medieval emperor who ruled much of Western Europe from 768 to 814. In 771, Charlemagne became king of the Franks, a Germanic tribe in present-day Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and western Germany.
Answer:
He was declared the Roman emperor because of his help in fighting the Magyars and protecting the pope.
