1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anzhelika [568]
2 years ago
13

The right of access to the courts is indeed but one aspect of the _____.

History
1 answer:
ivanzaharov [21]2 years ago
5 0

The right of access to the courts is indeed but one aspect of the <u>right to petition.</u>

<u>Explanation:</u>

When the constitution is looked into, it is revealed that the right to access to the courts is nothing but one of the aspects of the First Amendment’s right to petition the government for redress of one’s grievances. This can be easily seen as it is stated here, similar philosophy governs the approach of groups or citizens to administrative agencies which can both be seen as creatures of the legislature, and limbs of the executive, and to all the courts which are the third branch of the government.

Thus, it is more than implied that the right of petition is extended to all departments of the government including the courts. Thus, making it an aspect of the "right to petition".

You might be interested in
Why did the Soviet union certainly want to become better friends with United States just because China had
Lesechka [4]

Answer:

Improved relations with the Soviet Union and the PRC are often cited as the most successful diplomatic achievements of Nixon's presidency. ... The reason for opening up China was for the U.S. to gain more leverage over relations with the Soviet Union. Resolving the Vietnam War was a particularly important factor.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How does the presdient limit the judicial powers of the courts?
Nastasia [14]
I believe the answer is c
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Hamilton propose to protect U.S. manufacturers?
charle [14.2K]
Hamilton reasoned that tariffs would raise revenue to fund the nation.

the answer is b
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
NEED TO BE ANSWERED ASAP!!! WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST IF IT IS ANSWERED CORRECTLY
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

    The bombing of Hiroshima is and Nagaski is one of the most important events in history. Due to the fact that this affected and still is affecting human kind in Hiroshima and Nagaski. This all occurred because of Hiroshimas military and to the intend to make Japan surrender, in cause to end World War ll, they later decided to bomb Nagaski too. Over 200,000 died and thousands more were hurt in this tragity, but some surviors live to tell the story of this historic moment. Two of those surviors were Sunao Tsuboi and Shigemitsu Tanaka,  victims of the Hiroshima and Nagaski bombing on August 6, 1945 and August 9, of 1945.

   While Sunao Tsuboi was a 20 year old man heading to collage in Hiroshima  when this occurred, he was buned from head to toe he stated in NYTimes.com. He knew at this moment it would be the end for him, he layed next to a bridge. Until a classmate found and  approched him, he took him to a military hsopital where he got medical help. Till this day he is a retired worker, with a wife, children, and grandchildern. He has worked in office for the President and urged and stated this to the president to "work for world peace after he leave office".

  Shigemitsu Tanaka, was almost five when he witness this tragity. He discribed everything as white, windows braking, and a huge thunderclap in the sky. He was only playing under a tree when he took cover and tried to protect  himself. Later his mother suffered from repeated illnesses she worked as an elementary instructor. His father later died from cancer after 12 years of the bombing. Tanka said he "smelled burning flesh and moans", he also stated that Obama should clear nuclear wepons for good and hoped he would sit and listen to survivors.

   I would not defend nor support this tragity due to the fact that many innocent people were hurt or killed. In my opionion I think the United States should have used a diffrerent strategy to the point where no human being should have been hurt. Sometimes I do not understand why the United States didn't take percuation in this situation for the people. They always use the moto "For the good of the people" but did not lead up to this at the end. So in conculsion I DO NOT support or defend the bombing of Hiroshima or Nagaski.  

WRBSITES:https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.html

Hope this somewhat helps you out, make sure to check for spelling errors many typos.

websites: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.htmlExplanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What are some social effects of imperialism
guajiro [1.7K]
Increase of nationalism and capitalism and militarism increased competition
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where did most okies migrate to
    13·1 answer
  • At what point did the United States become involved in World War II?
    15·1 answer
  • In ancient Greek democracy, women were able to do what?
    13·1 answer
  • The dates that it asks for are 1920s, 1930s, and 1940s I really need this answered soon!!!
    9·1 answer
  • Eleanor Roosevelt contributed as a leader during World War II by
    14·2 answers
  • What is THOMAS?
    13·1 answer
  • After the Korean war, which side of creator is supported by America and which side is supported by the Soviet union?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of Deng Xiaoping's policies was the largest factor in the 1989
    15·1 answer
  • What was the difference between Muhammad's experience in Mecca around the year 610 and his experience when he returned to Mecca
    5·1 answer
  • Why hadn’t Europeans used maritime routes before the age of exploration?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!