The Wilmot Proviso pulled the nation apart because the southerners and northerners did not know whether to allow slavery in Mexico and the Wilmot Proviso automatically banned slavery in that region. ... Another was to allow the New Mexico and Utah territories to allow whether they wanted to have slavery.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. The limited role that the federal government had with the states was ended by Franklin Roosevelt and his New Deal.
Explanation:
The New Deal was the government program implemented by President Roosevelt from the beginning of his term in 1933, until his death in 1945. The President believed that the only way to get out of the Great Depression effectively was through the implementation of Keynesian economic policies, that is, through the active participation of the federal government in the economy.
Thus, from the beginning of his government, Roosevelt began to carry out government programs of various kinds, all aimed at the same objective of redirecting the economy on a path of growth, creating jobs and investment that energizes the economy and provides well-being to citizens. For this reason, programs such as the Work Progress Administration, the Social Security Act or the Tennessee Valley Authority, which through public investment sought to achieve these objectives, were the perfect example of a new trend through which the federal government would begin to participate much more actively in the economy.
It means that nothing written in the constitution can be used to cancel amendments to it.
Answer:
One of the many effects of the Crusades was that the pope and the kings of Western Europe became more powerful. In addition, Europeans began to trade with the Middle East. Trade increased as Western Europeans began to buy products like sugar, lemons, and spices. Naturally, increased trade led to increased cultural diffusion.
Explanation:
Cyrus' conquest was relatively humane compared to empires preceding his, such as the Babylonians and Assyrians. He allowed many areas of his empire a great deal of autonomy, rather than centrally controlling things. This distributed leadership allowed Persia to cover a greater geographical area than previous empires in that era and still be fairly stable, since most of its subjects were content to remain under Persian rule. Persian law was more codified and less arbitrary than previous empires; the king's seal declared approval of law which could only be reversed by further approved decrees -- not quite rule of law but going in that direction.