In order to support such contention, it is necessary to mention the exact historical origins of the Second Party system. In the first two decades of the 19th century, there were two main political parties: The Federalist Party and the Democratic-Republican Party. However, after 1816 the Federalist Party collapsed and for these elections the presidential race was not between parties but between candidates of the same party. In the 1824 presidential elections there were four presidential candidates (Henry Clay, William Crawford, Andrew Jackson, and John Quincy Adams). They were all Democratic Republicans. None of them obtained an Electoral College majority. Andrew Jackson was the candidate who had won the popular vote and had the most electoral votes of the four but did not have a full majority. Because of this it would have to be the House of Representatives that would chose the next president and Henry Clay, one of the candidates was its Speaker. He made a shady political deal with John Quincy Adams, he would elect Adams as new POTUS if Adams agreed to make him Secretary of State, which is exactly what occurred. Jackson was infuriated and vehemently denounced such political maneuverings. His followers were equally enraged and they all united to create a new Democratic party. Adams created his own National Republican Party but was ousted from the White House by Jackson’s Democratic Party in the 1828 elections. So it is quite safe to state that the Second Two Party System was created by those who supported Jackson versus those who opposed Jackson.
Answer:
Antisemitism (also spelled anti-semitism or anti-Semitism) is hostility to, prejudice, or discrimination against Jews. A person who holds such positions is called an antisemite.
<em>Hope I Helped</em>
<em />
Clarence Thomas (born June 23, 1948) is an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He was nominated by President George H. W. Bush and confirmed by the United States Senate to succeed Thurgood Marshall, and is the second African American to serve on the Court.
Answer:
It allows us citizens to fight for what we believe in(safely) through protests, campaigns, rallies, etc. Without the first amendment, no change would ever happen based on injustice with gender inequality, race inequality, religion inequality, etc Through this amendment the fight for anything(safely) can be stopped.
Explanation:
During World War I, the nation witnessed important demographic changes because African Americans and Mexicans were fed with how they were being treated. African American sand Mexicans moved to the north to seek better job opportunities. Also they moved to leave all the racism happening. With the area they were living there was not a lot of jobs available, so if you were a majority it made it that much harder. It was easier to find jobs in the north because the industrial work that was happening in the north. After people left the south and moved north, the African Americans and Mexicans would tell people back “home” how the north was. It was not perfect, but it was better than the circumstances they were living in. Job opportunities and less racism 4)Compare public sentiment during America’s involvement in World War II to that during its involvement in Vietnam. What policies, events, attitudes, and technological advancement contributed to the differences, if any?The American sentiment was patriotism. People were fight for their country during this time. The Pearl Harbor attack made the United States strong and shows how much patriotism this country had. The level of support the United States had was different in the Vietnam War. I think it was just because this is the third war the U.S was in back to back. The people in the military during this time worked to toward Victory Gardens and war bonds. The nation came to together when it came to Hitler and Japan because they were they enemies. They did horrible things to people. The Vietnam sentiment was a movement that was against the “Operation Rolling Thunder”. Here it was different than the United Stated because it was not as patriotic. It actually
Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
made people question their government. The war footage was published and presented and this showed the violence going during the war.