1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
insens350 [35]
3 years ago
15

Who first developed the statutory novelist protest

History
2 answers:
Pavlova-9 [17]3 years ago
5 0

The Statute of Anne, also known as the Copyright Act 1710 (cited either as 8 Ann. c. 21 or as 8 Ann. c. 19),[1] is an act of the Parliament of Great Britain passed in 1710, which was the first statute to provide for copyright regulated by the government and courts, rather than by private parties.

slamgirl [31]3 years ago
3 0

Background. With the introduction of the printing press to England by William Caxton in 1476, printed works became both more common and more economically important. As early as 1483, Richard III recognised the value of literary works by specifically exempting them from the government's protectionist legislation.

You might be interested in
What did paul rever's engraving show
Kruka [31]
It showed the boston massacre and highlighted how the British soldiers were ruthless and brutal in the firefight. 
8 0
2 years ago
Is freedom a trait or capacity of the individual that exists outside of society?
wolverine [178]

Answer:

Freedom is capacity of the individual that exists outside of society.

Explanation:

Freedom - A person's legal competence.

This means that legally, a person that has freedom, and it is in common sense that they would have it. Outside of society, it would be different and not the same, But we still have the right to entitle freedom to ourselves

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the purpose of the document of undelivered speech​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer: am not sure this is the answer but try it

Explanation:I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the willing sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution—the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith.”

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer—faith in our people and faith in God.

Basahin sa Filipino

4 0
3 years ago
The Romans defeated Hannibal because they _____
sammy [17]
In general, the Romans defeated Hannibal because they "<span>avoided battle, waited, and counted on the loyalty of their allies," since throughout most of the conflict Hannibal had a much larger army. </span>
5 0
2 years ago
Which of these was NOT an effect of the growth of the railroad system?
KiRa [710]
The third may not be an effect
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Under the Constitution, political rights protect the freedoms of
    11·2 answers
  • How are the cultures and people of the Americas different than Europe in 1491?
    7·1 answer
  • Why do people commit religious violence
    7·1 answer
  • How did the scientific method reflect a broader cultural trend in Europe
    5·2 answers
  • Why did Dr. Martin Luther King support John Kennedy’s presidential bid in 1960?
    13·1 answer
  • What do think the space race was?
    11·2 answers
  • In Ancient Egypt, 30 years into his reign a pharaoh had to run a circuit around posts during the Sed festival to legitimize his
    12·1 answer
  • Why did no other political parties challenged mussolini's rule
    6·1 answer
  • Which first lady said, "women’s rights are human rights"?
    9·1 answer
  • Map of the United States labeled "Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and Gadsden Purchase.". The map is divided into the 48 states of t
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!