1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nookie1986 [14]
3 years ago
7

Which three statements describe economic or social factors that led to Latin American revolutions? Slaves in Haiti revolted agai

nst plantation owners.
The strict social hierarchy imposed by European rulers limited people’s social status.
The low taxes made merchants and farmers go out of business.
Large numbers of indigenous people died from disease.
News of successful revolutions around the world inspired Latin American revolutions.
History
2 answers:
ch4aika [34]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The correct answers ( I believe ) are

A. Slaves in Haiti revolted against plantation owners.

B. The strict social hierarchy imposed by European rulers limited people's social status.

E. News of successful revolutions around the world inspired Latin American revolutions.

Explanation:

I know B and E are right, and I know that contrary to everyone else's belief on this site, C is incorrect. Hope this helps you out! ( Mark as Brainliest if correct ^^~ )

Sergeu [11.5K]3 years ago
3 0
The three would be A C and E
You might be interested in
Why did the Kingdom of Israel split?
scZoUnD [109]

Throughout their history in the Promised Land, the children of Israel struggled with conflict among the tribes. The disunity went back all the way to the patriarch Jacob, who presided over a house divided. The sons of Leah and the sons of Rachel had their share of contention even in Jacob’s lifetime (Genesis 37:1-11).


The enmity among the half-brothers continued in the time of the judges. Benjamin (one of Rachel’s tribes) took up arms against the other tribes (Judges 20). Israel’s first king, Saul, was of the tribe of Benjamin. When David was crowned king—David was from the tribe of Judah (one of Leah’s tribes)—the Benjamites rebelled (2 Samuel 2–3). After a long war (2 Samuel 3:1), David succeeded in uniting all twelve tribes (5:1-5).


The frailty of the union was exposed, however, when David’s son Absalom promoted himself as the new king and drew many Israelites away from their allegiance to David (2 Samuel 15). Significantly, Absalom set up his throne in Hebron, the site of the former capital (v. 10). A later revolt was led by a man named Sheba against David and the tribe of Judah (20:1-2).


The reign of David’s son Solomon saw more unrest when one of the king’s servants, Jeroboam, rebelled. Jeroboam was on the king’s errand when he met the prophet Ahijah, who told him that God was going to give him authority over ten of the twelve tribes of Israel. God’s reason for the division of the kingdom was definitive: “Because they have forsaken me . . . and have not walked in my ways.” However, God promised that David’s dynasty would continue, albeit over a much smaller kingdom, for the sake of God’s covenant with David and for the sake of Jerusalem, God’s chosen city. When Solomon learned of the prophecy, he sought to kill Jeroboam, who fled to Egypt for sanctuary (1 Kings 11:26-40).


After Solomon’s death, his son Rehoboam was set to become the next king. Jeroboam returned from Egypt and led a group of people to confront Rehoboam with a demand for a lighter tax burden. When Rehoboam refused the demand, ten of the tribes rejected Rehoboam and David’s dynasty (1 Kings 12:16), and Ahijah’s prophecy was fulfilled. Only Judah and Benjamin remained loyal to King Rehoboam. The northern tribes crowned Jeroboam as their king. Rehoboam made plans to mount an assault on the rebel tribes, but the Lord prevented him from taking that action (vv. 21-24). Meanwhile, Jeroboam further consolidated his power by instituting a form of calf worship unique to his kingdom and declaring that pilgrimages to Jerusalem were unnecessary. Thus, the people of the northern tribes would have no contact with the tribes of Judah and Benjamin.


“So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day” (1 Kings 12:19). The northern kingdom is called “Israel” (or sometimes “Ephraim”) in Scripture, and the southern kingdom is called “Judah.” From the divine viewpoint, the division was a judgment on not keeping God’s commands, specifically the commands prohibiting idolatry. From a human viewpoint, the division was the result of tribal discord and political unrest. The principle is that sin brings division (1 Corinthians 1:13, 11:18; James 4:1).


The good news is that God, in His mercy, has promised a reuniting of the northern and southern kingdoms. “He will raise a banner for the nations / and gather the exiles of Israel; / he will assemble the scattered people of Judah / from the four quarters of the earth. / Ephraim’s jealousy will vanish, / and Judah’s enemies will be destroyed; / Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah, / nor Judah hostile toward Ephraim” (Isaiah 11:12-13). When the Prince of Peace—Jesus Christ—reigns in His millennial kingdom, all hostility, jealousy, and conflict among the tribes will be put to rest.


4 0
4 years ago
Which inventions and improvements led to the era of European exploration?
gulaghasi [49]
I’m just answering my first question everyone
6 0
3 years ago
Can someone help me on 25 please!! :)
Naya [18.7K]
First one...............
3 0
3 years ago
What compromise did the governments of the united states and japan reach on immigration
Sav [38]

Answer:

n 1908, the Japanese and American governments arrived at what became known as the "Gentlemen's Agreement"; Japan agreed to limit emigration to the U.S., while the U.S. granted admission to the wives, children, and other relatives of immigrants already resident.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Suppose you saw an ad for a candidate that included the phrase "She's one of us." a Which technique would that represent?
erastova [34]

Answer:

I believe the answer is:

c. the bandwagon

Explanation:

i think it is c. the bandwagon because of the phrase "shes one of us" refers to how everyone in the bandwagon just follows one another.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Soviet Union and the United States nearly went to war with each other in 1962 when the United States discovered Soviet missi
    11·2 answers
  • What were the long-term effects of Jane Addams’ efforts
    13·1 answer
  • Which explanation accurately describes adam smiths concept of the natrual price
    9·2 answers
  • Powers of Congress that are directly written in the Constitution are called
    12·1 answer
  • What is hydrulucking
    12·1 answer
  • Both The Diary of Anne Frank and the "Frank Family and World War II Timeline" note the Allied invasion of Normandy in June 1944.
    6·1 answer
  • 4. What did the convention vote to do? *
    9·1 answer
  • Explain three difficulties women faced during the Civil War:
    9·2 answers
  • What was the main effect of the Peloponnesian War?
    8·2 answers
  • Which President was known for the statement "Speak softy and carry a big stick?"
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!