The branches work against eachother when it comes to laws. The legislative branch makes laws, but the President can veto those laws with a Presidential Veto. The legislative branch makes laws, but the judicial branch can declare those laws unconstitutional.
I think because if one person held a monopoly on (let's say clothes) it provides less variety for everyone as well as essentially they get all of the revenue and smaller (family owned and such stores) businesses go out of business or bought by the bigger businesses. (Also think of the board game Monopoly, when someone owns a lot of places that cost a lot and people land on it, they pay a lot. Then someone runs out of money and has to sell the property, meaning less of a chance for them to make money and those with money now buy the available land, increasing their chances of getting money) (So essentially the rich get richer and the poor get poorer and there is a large wealth disparity)
Hope this explanation helps. If not, I could try to elaborate.
Cuba. Here is evidence: "U.S. victory in the war produced a peace treaty that compelled the Spanish to relinquish claims on Cuba, and to cede sovereignty over Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines to the United States. The United States also annexed the independent state of Hawaii during the conflict."
Source: https://history.state.gov/milestones/1866-1898/spanish-american-war
Answer:
Montana and Canada
Explanation:
Arkansas and Mississippi are divided by a river.
Texas and Oklahoma are split by a river.
Texas and Mexico are separated by a river.
Montana and Canada and have no natural boundary.
Answer:B
Explanation:
He could not afford an attorney so he requested one, but the Judge denied it because in Florida only criminals charged with capital crime must be appointed an attorney
