The difference between ensuring domestic tranquility and providing common defense is related to the scope of events. In a situation of ensuring domestic tranquility, the US government has a duty to maintain peace within the country's borders.
Providing common defense refers to plans and actions to keep the nation safe from foreign threats, through an effective national army ready to defend the country under any circumstances.
<h3 /><h3>What is the need to promote national security?</h3>
It is essential for the maintenance of a safe country, where each citizen has their human and civil rights protected, by measures and actions of the country's leaders in favor of peace and the quality of life of its citizens.
Therefore, ensuring domestic tranquility and providing common defense are duties of the government of a country, which must be ready to protect the country from threats that jeopardize its security and sovereignty.
Find out more about National Security here:
brainly.com/question/25375059
#SPJ1
Answer:
Each state would have a democratic form of government.
Every citizen would be properly represented in government.
Explanation:
Since all citizens were represented, they include the African-American population, since they would cease to be slaves and that each government would be elected by the people, since no military board or authority could not declare that it does not have popular representation and mandate of the people
Answer: The one about the US ships not being to enter goes first. The second one that has the names with Thomas Jefferson's goes second. The one with the names of different battles goes last.
Explanation:
Answer: Reagan did not stop communism (communism never existed and its ideology is still here....there are many communist parties all over the world which is quite surprising and incredible) but practiced very well Kennan´s strategy of "containment". Communism itself underwent serious crises (1956 Hungary, 1968 Czechoslovakia, 80s in Poland) ...in 1980s there was a lot of dissatisfaction in the Eastern block, anti-communist opposition was growing and USSR became aware that reforms are necessary. Gorbatchev (from 1985) was really aware that the communist regimes are no longer sustainable. There were various factors.
Explanation: communist regimes exhausted themselves, nothing worked....economically and ideologically as well. That was something which helped very much to Reagan.
