Because so they can avoid opinions and get the facts. Also because depending on the origin of the historian, he may have a prerequisite <span>feelings towards a culture or a nation.</span>
It would be "(D) the bombing of the Oklahoma City Federal Building," that is not associated with Al Qaeda, since this was an act of "domestic terrorism," that was carried out by a Christian white male.
One could be the rise of towns and the crusades. The Crusades was a campaign to reclaim the
Holy from Muslim rule. Despite the
number of campaigns launched. The Holy
remained under Muslim control and this weakened the feudal system as the
nobility spent most of their wealth on these campaigns. This led to the growth of towns where merchants
grew rich and became a force in society which led to the rise of the
Renaissance where interest was centered on the classics.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
the Constitution needs to create the branches of the government
Answer:
History books portray him as a brutal emperor who massacred millions of Asian and Eastern European people. However, he also practiced religious and racial tolerance, and his Mongolian Empire valued the leadership of women. Khan also brought law and civilization to Mongolia and is regarded as a hero in his native land. So technically he is neither a villain or a hero.