1. doesn't she
2. can you
hope this helps! have a great day!
In this exercise, you have to write an essay giving your point of view about where young offenders should be sent.
An essay should have an introduction, a body where you state why you think what you think and a conclusion where you give the essay a closure and you reaffirm what you stated before.
In this case, you need to take into account writing about:
1. Being punished for a crime. You need to explain if you think the punishment should be being sent to an army camp or to prison. However, you can even discuss if punishment is okay or if there should be another penalization after a young person commits a crime. Since it is an opinion essay, you can decide what you want to say regarding this specific item.
2. Learning life skills. Here you might want to discuss what place is better to learn life skills or whether they are able to learn any life skills there or not, also, you can discuss how young offenders should learn life skills.
3. You have to write something that has not been said before in the essay about the topic. For example, you can tell your opinion regarding young offenders being in the same place as adult offenders who have been in prison for a long time.
In conclusion, it is up to you what you want to write in the essay but you need to be aware of the <u>essay structure</u> and also <u>writing about what you are being asked.</u>
You can find<u> more information </u>on how to write a good opinion essay in the following link brainly.com/question/23850825?referrer=searchResults
Could you make the image better quality it’s hard to read
Answer:
In the poem "The Road Not Taken," the author Robert Frost Makes reference to a diverged road, in which the speaker must make a decision about which road to pick. Thus, in the last stanza, by the words "somewhere ages and ages hence," he means that sometime in the future he will give a sigh of relief or regret about having taken his own path in life.
A person can think however they want. Actions, like many have said, define a person in the end. Someone can advocate for peace with malicious intent, but they will still likely be remembered for advocating peace and not for their impure motivations. If these contradicting images are revealed to the public, that is still an act against that person, and is no longer a thought.
However, this is only from the public's view. When it comes to people, they may as well be the embodiment of their thoughts. Everything is fueled by something. The same person who seeds their own goals under the guise of peace will not think of themselves as one who acts with the intentions of bringing peace. They will be looking to call forth whatever it is that they want, and be aware that what they present to the public is not the truth.
So, both points are arguable. It depends on whether you value the individual or the community. Actions are what are remembered, and thoughts are a person's reason. Even today, this comes into relevancy because people want to know why certain figures in history did what they did. Thoughts make a person human, after all. Without thought, seperation of man and beast would be nigh impossible. Without action, man would have been left behind long ago. Both thought and action are important indeed.
