The answer is the 3rd option because after the sentence mentions the teacher it says “that was late” making the sentence seem like the teacher was the late one and not keiko’s project
<span>Yes. I think the
narrator had a right to was angry with Stephen Mackaye. The narrator wanted to
stay far of Spot and decided abandon his friend Stephen and Spot, so he ran
away. The narrator continued his life, but once was surprised by his abandoned
friend. Stephen discovered where the narrator was living and left Spot on his
gate, after that, ran away too, exactly how the narrator did. Of course the
narrator was mad with, “now”, your “enemy”. Although, what the narrator did was
not correct too, abandon his “friend” with the dog. In the text has a passage that describes the moment
that the narrator is angry with Stephen: “</span><span>A
year went by. I was back in the office and prospering in all ways--even getting
a bit fat. And then Steve arrived. He didn't look me up. I read his name in the
steamer list, and wondered why. But I didn't wonder long. I got up one morning
and found that Spot chained to the gate-post and
holding up the milkman. Steve went north to Seattle, I learned, that very
morning. I didn't put on any more weight. My wife made me buy him a collar and
tag. And that is why I am disappointed in Stephen Mackaye. I had no idea he was
so mean a man.”</span>
Answer:
It is dramatic irony, blind people cannot see so they will never see these emojis
Answer:
Paying attention to text features and visual cues is one way to get a sense of the main focus of a text.
Explanation:
B. the deeper message of a literary work
