1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horsena [70]
3 years ago
13

write a 250-word essay that argues your opinion about the Constitutional Convention. You can imagine you are one of the delegate

s to the convention and argue from that perspective. You can even choose a specific player in the debates and compromises. In your essay, answer these questions: Do you think the final version of the US Constitution created a political system that gives too much, too little or just enough power to the central government? Do you think the Great Compromise created a functional and fair representative congress? Use this Knowledge Article to help gather resources, form your argument, and write your essay.
History
2 answers:
xxTIMURxx [149]3 years ago
8 0
I'd say just enough power, as there is equal representation in the house of representatives and equal representation in the senate, so there is neither a tyrannical majority or minority. Also, the central government created by this therefore had to depend on opinion within the states, meaning they were not given way to much power. 
Therefore, yes, the Great Compromise created a functional and fair representative congress.
nikitadnepr [17]3 years ago
8 0
Just for 5 points???
You might be interested in
What was the purpose of the march on washington for jobs and freedom program?
riadik2000 [5.3K]

The March was about civil rights, voting rights and racial equality, but it was also about the need for jobs and for jobs that paid a decent wage. The marchers wanted the federal minimum wage raised nearly 75 percent, from $1.15 an hour to $2.00 an hour. They also called for “A massive federal program to train and place all unemployed workers—Negro and white—on meaningful and dignified jobs at decent wages.”

In 1963, the unemployment rate averaged about 5.0 percent, which looks good compared to today’s 8.3 percent, but King and the other organizers wanted full employment and believed it was the federal government’s responsibility to provide it. If that meant hiring 3 million people, so be it; every American had the right to decent paid work if he wanted it. The economy had to be structured in a way that left no one behind.

The march’s key civil rights demands were met in 1964 and 1965 with passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. But the economic demands were never met. The minimum wage was raised to $1.25 in Sept. 1963, but it didn’t reach $2.00 an hour until 1974, by which time inflation had shrunk its value back to 1963 levels.

Today, with the separation of the 1 percent from the rest of us, and the government’s shrinking commitment to the well-being of the less fortunate, the economic disparities in America are worse than they were in 1963. Despite the legislative achievements of the 1960s, African Americans still suffer in fact from segregated housing, segregated schools, and segregated employment opportunities, all of which on average are worse than the housing, education and job opportunities available to whites.

We need a better, higher minimum wage; we need full employment; and we need a national commitment to equal economic opportunity.

6 0
3 years ago
How long did john f kennedy serve as president?
Sauron [17]
John F. Kennedy was the 35th president and served from January 1961 tell his assignation in 1963 in November.
8 0
3 years ago
Which statement BEST describes the reason for Russia's high military death rate? A) Russian troops fought until the last battle
Leviafan [203]

Hahah I'm Russian  so I'm def going to answer this

The answer is A, they would fight till the last battles

Russians aren't quitters :)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This side only had to fight a defensive war? North or south
Andreyy89

Answer:

The North was fighting for reunification, and the South for independence. But as the war progressed, the Civil War gradually turned into a social, economic and political revolution with unforeseen consequences. The Union war effort expanded to include not only reunification, but also the abolition of slavery

Explanation:

hope it will help you

4 0
2 years ago
How is rationalism different from puritanism
Vika [28.1K]

Answer:

Rationalism vs Puritanism Rationalism. A form of religion where instead of believing in a higher been, Science and reasoning are what is lived by. ... While the Puritans believed that everyone had a pre-destined faith, Rationalists believed in no such thing.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What allowed the people of Ghana to cross the Sahara in order to trade with others?
    14·1 answer
  • Match each civilian administrator below with the World War I mobilization agency that he directed. A. George Creel 1. War Indust
    5·1 answer
  • 3
    12·1 answer
  • Portuguese word which means pearl of iregular shape A. medieval B.Renaissance C. Baroque period​
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement is true regarding the Cherokee during the French and Indian War?
    12·1 answer
  • 9. What was the relationship between the Soviet Union and Germany at the beginning of WW11?​
    6·2 answers
  • The hindu creator god is?
    15·1 answer
  • A noble gas is least likely to?
    5·1 answer
  • An amendment is a (blank) to the constitution
    5·1 answer
  • Help help ASAP help math
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!