There isn't a prime factorization of -96
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Given

(a): Write as additive inverse.
An additive inverse is of the form a + (-b)
In this case:


So, the expression can be represented as:

(b): Number line representation
When the expression in (a) is solved.
The result is:

This means that the number line must accommodate 7 and -1.
Having said that, options (b) and (c) are out because their range is 0 to 15 and this excludes -1.
Option (d) is a wrong representation of 
Hence, (a) is correct
Answer:
just make an account
Step-by-step explanation:
Sample space = {p, r, o, b, a, b, i, l, I, t, y} = 11 possible outcomes
1sr event: drawing an I ( there are 2 I); P(1st I) = 2/11
2nd event drawing also an i: This is a conditional probability, since one I has already been selected the remaining number of I is now 1, but also the sample space from previously 11 outcome has now 10 outcomes (one letter selected and not replaced)
2nd event : P(also one I) = 1/10
P(selecting one I AND another I) is 2/11 x 1/10
P(selecting one I AND another I) =2/110 = 0.018
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
We know two sides and the angle between the sides, so we can use the Law of Cosines. Recall that the Law of Cosines states that:
, where a and b are the sides and C is the angle in between.
Let's substitute 115 for a, 178 for b, and 41 for Angle C.
Thus:



