You didn't provide us with choices, so I'll simply provide some historical explanation. The main issue was whether the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights added.
The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states. Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA. They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.
Federalists believed the Constitution itself clearly limited government power and protected the rights of the people. Nevertheless, the addition of a Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided reassurance to Anti-Federalists in the fight over ratification. The compromise which led to agreement in regard to ratification of the Constitution was called the Massachusetts Compromise, because of major opposition to ratification that had existed in Massachusetts. John Hancock and Samuel Adams (both of them anti-Federalists) were the ones who helped negotiate the compromise. The anti-Federalists agreed that they would support ratification of the Constitution, with the understanding that recommendations for amendments would follow if the Constitution was ratified. The Federalists promised to support the proposed amendments, which would outline a Bill of Rights to guarantee protection of specific rights the anti-Federalists wanted specifically asserted in the Constitution.
The US Constitution was ratified in 1788. The Bill of Rights was created in 1789 and ratified in 1791.
Hello there.
Who was the first to write about the connection between economic growth and capitalism during the industrial revolution?
<span>The rise of capitalism</span>
The answer to this question will be A. Losses ARE limited to the original investment.
El cuentro El armario de Thomas Mann narra la historia de Albrecht van der Qualen, un viajero solitario y taciturno el cual no repara en detalles minúsculos de la vida ni le gusta saber en qué ciudad, día o estación se encuentra.La historia comienza cuando Albrecht se despierta de un sueño fugaz en un tren, desorientado. Cuenta como no sabe dónde se encuentra y el placer que esto le proporciona. Al darse cuenta que tal vez pueda estar en una parte de Alemania, Albrecht se baja del tren en búsqueda de un lugar para dormir. Se dirige a una posada gerenciada por una extraña anciana, quien le muestra la habitación en donde se estará quedando. Dicha habitación solo consta de una cama y una armario, lo cual era suficiente para Albrecht. En un punto de la noche, Albrecht se da cuenta que en el armario vive una criatura humana femenina totalmente desnuda, que empieza a contarle historias. El narrador da a entender que Albrecht nunca se mudó de esa posada, ya que había sido encantado por la criatura.
Supremacy clause states that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties constitute the supreme law of the land and that every institution should abide by those rules.
