1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stepan [7]
3 years ago
7

Read the passage from A Doll’s House.

English
2 answers:
Natalka [10]3 years ago
6 0

4.“It would upset our mutual relations altogether”. This is the correct version.

<em>It</em> refers to the possibility of Nora's husband learning the truth. The truth is that Nora borrowed money from Krogstad, a bank clerk. Nora's husband , Torvald, is Krogstad's boss.  Therefore, if Torvald learns that his  employee lent money to his wife, the relationship between husband and wife will be ruined. Besides, Torvald wants to fire Krogstad because he does not like his attitude. The word <em>altogether - </em>completely - is emphatic. It reflects Nora's fears of losing her relationship with her husband.

These options are wrong:

1. “no idea what a dangerous condition he was in”. This refers to Nora's comments about the heatlh of her husband. He ignored his illness.

2. “how I came to devise a way out of the difficulty”. Nora refers to the solution she had got in mind to save her husband.

3.“I had meant to let him in on the secret”. Nora wanted to share her secret with her father, but the father died. Nora had told her husband that her father had lent her the money but this was not true. Nora had asked Krogstad for money.

Lady_Fox [76]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is D. This option suggests that Nora is afraid of breaking up with her husband due to the secret she kept. The inference can be made specifically from the words "upset" and "mutual relationship". The other options are evidence of the secret that she is keeping, and although they might make reference to Nora's fear of losing her husband, the last option is more direct in this sense.

You might be interested in
Some researchers believe that First officer William Murdoch could’ve prevented the Titanic from sinking
nirvana33 [79]

Researchers believed that First officer William Murdoch could’ve prevented the Titanic from sinking if he had acted early before the ship struck an iceberg.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Titanic was a liner (cruise) on board with 2,223 people from Southampton to New York.  That hit on an iceberg while traveling in the sea and sunk in the North Atlantic Ocean. William Murdoch was the First Officer of the ship.

When the officer-in-charge warned him about the iceberg that has been spotted in the ship's path. And William waited for 30 seconds before changing the ship's direction.

Researchers had found that the iceberg was sighted at the distance of 1500 ft from the ship from the investigation of evidence. And the collision happened after 7 seconds of William's order to change the course.

If he didn't hesitate for that 30 seconds to give order then the ship could have saved as well as the people.

7 0
4 years ago
Why did stalin make his followers confess to crimes they didn't do
Finger [1]

Answer:

Often based on forced confessions, the trials made a mockery of the idea of due process of law. All the participants of these so-called "show trials," including the judges, served Stalin's political evil.Stalin often persecuted people not for what they did, but for who they were. Anyone having anything to do with foreigners or foreign countries automatically became suspects of spying. This included entire groups of people such as foreign language teachers, members of pen pal organizations, even stamp collectors. Those with religious backgrounds like Catholic priests, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Jews were arrested in large numbers. Agricultural officials, factory managers, and engineers were frequently accused of economic sabotage known as "wrecking." They were blamed for railway accidents, livestock diseases, crop failures, and hundreds of other shortcomings in the Soviet economy. Finally, Communist Party officials at higher and higher levels were arrested and charged with being "oppositionists" or followers of Stalin's hated rival, Leon Trotsky.

Explanation:

Stalin demanded confessions from his victims. To extract these confessions, the secret police resorted to a variety of methods. The "conveyor" involved the continuous interrogation of a person by relays of police for hours and even days at a time. Intellectuals and the party elite were often subjected to the "long interrogation" by a single interrogator who carried on his questioning sometimes for weeks and months.

Some people confessed when police interrogators threatened family members. Others hoped that by cooperating they would save themselves. Many confessed under beatings and torture, at first an unofficial means of gaining a confession. In 1937, Stalin made torture the official and usual method of getting confessions. Stalin reportedly ordered the secret police to "beat, beat, and beat again."

Many caught up in the mass arrests invented "crimes" so that they could confess to something. Many admitted guilt without even knowing the charges. However, some top Communist Party officials arrested on orders from Stalin confessed for quite another reason. These members of the old generation of revolutionaries came to power with Lenin in 1917 and had such faith in the party that they refused to believe it could ever be wrong. In Arthur Koestler's novel, Darkness at Noon, the main character named Rubashov is falsely accused of plotting the assassination of "No. 1"(Stalin). Rubashov finally "confesses" after declaring, "I will do everything which may serve the Party." In the novel, he willingly took a bullet in the head after becoming convinced that he must be guilty because the party said so.

4 0
4 years ago
Pls help no file pls I can't open it!
frosja888 [35]
The correct answer is A I believe
5 0
3 years ago
I will mark as brainlest
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

The cartoon isn't criticizing anyone in particular, but the school system today inputs knowledge into your brain that won't be useful later on, and if you don't understand that or do not keep up, you will be "left behind", while useful knowledge that could be used later is labeled not useful. The target of the image is to put it simply, the school system. I can see them using reversal, as they are changing the ways school was intended to be used in the first place.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Is dormant and dominant synonyms or antonyms
amid [387]
Dormat and Domiant are antonyms.
Your answer is <span><em>antonyms</em>.</span>
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • CREON:
    9·1 answer
  • so it was not hungry. Morning so she just had a smidgen of the cake at the office birthday party which word in this sentence pro
    8·1 answer
  • What vowel sound does the ie make in this word?
    14·2 answers
  • How can i write a 5 paragraph article
    8·2 answers
  • Discuss how historical context affects our understanding of Scout. In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird.
    14·1 answer
  • Which word or phrase best completes the following sentence?
    8·2 answers
  • Who wants to talk? happy easter btw &lt;333
    9·2 answers
  • What kind of effect did the carpet have on the child?<br>​
    7·2 answers
  • How did the United States respond to the 9/11 attacks.
    9·1 answer
  • Question 5 of 5
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!