1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gennadij [26K]
3 years ago
7

Everyone is entitled to all the rights set forth in this Declaration, regardless of race, color, gender, language, religion, pol

itical opinion, national or social origin, property, or other status.
One example of when Pol Pot took this right away from Cambodians that I saw in the video was when…
History
1 answer:
Alex3 years ago
4 0
Logan you are my hero, you mean the world to me, if I ever met you, I’ll give you a great big hug
You might be interested in
Think back to the example in the Warm-Up: A business owner wants to open a restaurant, but many residents do not want a business
Helga [31]
For the answer to the question above, the r<span>esidents must file a petition to the local council and in turn, the local council will hear both sides and eventually making an informed decision whether to release a business permit or not to the said restaurant. I hope this helps you.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL GIVE BRAINLEST NEED HELP ASAP LINKS WILL GET REPORTED
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

1.

A. Christians

B. Muslims

C. Non-Religious

2. Buddhists

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
When a political group grandstands or exaggerates its position to the public, it can be said it is ____ for approval.
Rashid [163]
<span>When a political group grandstands or exaggerates its position to the public, it can be said that it is posturing for approval.

Hope this helps :)</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
is a measure of behaviors by producers and consumers in response to changes in price. Sign out GB hp​
Step2247 [10]

Answer:

microeconomics

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which of these statements best explain why the decision made in the deed Scott case nullified the compromise of 1850 and “popula
Elza [17]

The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.

In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • After congress passed the homestead act in 1862 what happened
    15·1 answer
  • 4 impacts of the Atlantic slave trade
    10·1 answer
  • Which river is the center of the largest river system in the Tropical North?
    11·2 answers
  • Why did Italians feel strongly about their nationalist ideas
    5·1 answer
  • When was the the English bill of rights written and by who
    8·1 answer
  • The letters A and B mark two bodies of water that surround Southeast Asia, the ________ and ________. *
    10·2 answers
  • where did the chinese nationalist party relocate after the communist takeover? a. tibet b. russia c. taiwan d. manchuria
    7·1 answer
  • According to federal law, which of the following pieces of legislation addressing illegal immigration would state governments be
    14·2 answers
  • Describe actions taken by Louis XIV that show this individual was an absolute ruler:
    6·1 answer
  • The Sherman Anti-Trust Act was created
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!