Answer:
1.36x10^10L
Explanation:
Step 1:
Determination of the mole of fluorine that contains 3.66x10^32 molecules. This is shown below:
From Avogadro's hypothesis, we understood that 1 mole of any substance contains 6.02x10^23 molecules. This implies that 1 mole of fluorine also contains 6.02x10^23 molecules.
Now if 1 mole of fluorine contains 6.02x10^23 molecules,
Therefore, Xmol of fluorine will contain 3.66x10^32 molecules i.e
Xmol of fluorine = 3.66x10^32/6.02x10^23
Xmol of fluorine = 6.08x10^8 moles
Step 2:
Determination of the volume occupied by 6.08x10^8 moles of fluorine.
1 mole of any gas occupy 22.4L at stp. This means that 1 mole of fluorine also occupy 22.4L at stp.
Now if 1 mole of fluorine occupies 22.4L at stp,
Then 6.08x10^8 moles of fluorine will occupy = 6.08x10^8 x 22.4 = 1.36x10^10L
Answer:
B. CO + H₂O → H₂ + CO₂
Explanation:
Redox reaction -
It is the type of reaction , where the process of oxidation and reduction takes place simultaneously , is known as a redox reaction .
Oxidation refers to the addition of oxygen atom or the removal of hydrogen atom .
And ,
Reduction refers to the addition of hydrogen atom or the removal of the oxygen atom .
From the options given in the question , the only reaction , which have both the process of oxidation as well as reduction , is -
CO + H₂O → H₂ + CO₂
In the above reaction ,
Oxidation process - CO → CO₂ ,
The addition of oxygen atom .
Reduction process - H₂O → H₂ ,
The removal of oxygen atom .
The molecular formula for the compound is 
<u>Explanation</u>:
As with all of these problems, we assume 100 g of an unknown compound.
And thus, we determine the elemental composition by the given percentages.
Moles of carbon = 85.64 / 12.011
= 7.13 mol.
Moles of hydrogen = 14.36 / 1.00794
= 14.25 mol.
There are 2 moles of hydrogen per mole of carbon. And thus the empirical formula is CH
.
And molecular formula = n × (empirical formula)
Thus, 42.08 = n × (12.011 + 2 × 1.00794)
And thus n = 3, and molecular formula = 
This is a straightforward dilution calculation that can be done using the equation
where <em>M</em>₁ and <em>M</em>₂ are the initial and final (or undiluted and diluted) molar concentrations of the solution, respectively, and <em>V</em>₁ and <em>V</em>₂ are the initial and final (or undiluted and diluted) volumes of the solution, respectively.
Here, we have the initial concentration (<em>M</em>₁) and the initial (<em>V</em>₁) and final (<em>V</em>₂) volumes, and we want to find the final concentration (<em>M</em>₂), or the concentration of the solution after dilution. So, we can rearrange our equation to solve for <em>M</em>₂:

Substituting in our values, we get
![\[M_2=\frac{\left ( 50 \text{ mL} \right )\left ( 0.235 \text{ M} \right )}{\left ( 200.0 \text{ mL} \right )}= 0.05875 \text{ M}\].](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5BM_2%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5Cleft%20%28%2050%20%5Ctext%7B%20mL%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%5Cleft%20%28%200.235%20%5Ctext%7B%20M%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%7D%7B%5Cleft%20%28%20200.0%20%5Ctext%7B%20mL%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%7D%3D%200.05875%20%5Ctext%7B%20M%7D%5C%5D.)
So the concentration of the diluted solution is 0.05875 M. You can round that value if necessary according to the appropriate number of sig figs. Note that we don't have to convert our volumes from mL to L since their conversion factors would cancel out anyway; what's important is the ratio of the volumes, which would be the same whether they're presented in milliliters or liters.