Explanation:
They were both rather reactionary intent on rolling back the revolution but Louis XVIII. Both were monarchs who seeked to crush those against their will and impose their images as the legitimate rulers. Louis XVIII was more moderate and a consensus builder who often selected centrist oriented ministers to help the French people and shunned violence used against former members of the Bonapartist regime. He also made no attempts to overturn the constitutional monachy and respected elections. Charles X was a brutal autocrat who was extremely reactionary and hoped to restore France to the ancien regime. He selected his fellow ultra royalists as his ministers who did not care about the interests of the French people. Charles X also attempted to override the charter that had create the constitutional monarchy of the Bourbon restoration. Charles was overthrown in the Revolution of 1830 which installed a more liberal king, Louis Phillipe.
<span>Prussian military expert Baron von Steuben contributed primarily to the American war effort in which of the following ways:
A. He trained the Continental Army at Valley Forge.
</span><span> The Indians that fought in the American Revolution usually sided with:
A.British.
Not sure about the last one though</span>
NO, I tend not to believe so.
Harry S. Truman executive order, the Truman Directive” which
was issued on December 22, 1945, faced congressional disorder for close to 3 years
after the war ended and nearly 17 months after Truman’s state of the Union
challenge in 1947. It was finally signed on June 2, 1948 and the Senate passed
the refugee bill.
However, the period between which "Truman Directive" was issued and when it was finally signed in 1948, more displaced persons were admitted to the US than before,
but the overall number of immigrants did not increase. About 22,950 DPs, of
whom 2/3rds were Jewish, entered the US between 1945 and 1947 under Truman
Directive provisions.
