Answer: False
Explanation:
When more than one alternative can be selected from those available, the alternatives are said to be mutually exclusive. In evaluating independent alternatives, each alternative is compared against the "Do Nothing" alternative.
For mutually exclusive alternatives, the do-nothing is a viable option when revenue alternatives are involved.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Cameron is the sales director for his Northeast company's region. He's a rehional sales director.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
A Regional Sales Director is in charge of the closeout of a business' items or administrations in a predetermined district or geological region. The provincial project supervisor gives progressing backing to disseminate and create to item or administration.
Furthermore, the territorial project lead deals with a business group in the predefined zone. Subsequently, Cameron is the local deals Director.
The population is the 10,900 respondents to the American Time Use Survey.
Explanation & Solution:
Statistics indicate that a large number of findings with similar features are related to in the population.
A sample is a subset from which it has been extracted.
"The American Time Usage survey for 2015 provides details about how many minutes of sleep every evening are assigned to each of 10,900 survey respondents.
An SRS of 100 participants (a plain random sample) has x = 514.4 minutes on average.
The size of the U.S. Time Utilization Survey is 10,900.
The advantages of entrepreneurship include the ability to shape one's own business, control of one's own working habits, and significant stock in the venture. Disadvantages include a lack of guarantee of success and the heightened responsibility of owning a business. Higher take-home pay.
Tax relief on business expenses.
Greater opportunity for tax planning.
Total control of your business and name.
One company for all your business interests.
Limited liability and protection of personal assets.
Answer:
Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus
Explanation:
The options to this question wasn't provided. Here are the options : Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus. Both parties experience surplus, so the transaction was equitable. Only Steve benefits from the sale. Srivani will not be happy with her purchase.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least amount the seller is willing to sell his good.
While both parties earn a surplus, the producer surplus exceeds the consumer surplus . Therefore, the seller benefited more from the trade than the consumer.
I hope my answer helps you