All categories

3 years ago

If you were charged $1152 in taxes on a $2560 purchase. What percent tax were you charged

Business

1 answer:

katen-ka-za [31]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Percent tax = 45%

Explanation:

Given:

Amount of tax charged = $1,152

Amount of purchase = $2,560

Find:

Percent tax

Computation:

Percent tax = [Amount of tax charged / Amount of purchase]100

Percent tax = [1152 / 2560]100

Percent tax = 45%

You might be interested in

On june 1, 2022, spk company signed a $100,000, one-year, 6 percent note payable. Interest and principal are due at maturity. Wh

posledela

$3500 sum will spk record for interest expense in their december 31, 2022

Interest = $ 6000 for 12 months.

From June to December there will be 7 months due,

therefore 7/12x6000 = $ 3500

An interest expense is the fetched brought about by an substance for borrowed reserves. Intrigued cost may be a non-operating cost appeared on the salary explanation. It speaks to intrigued payable on any borrowings—bonds, credits, convertible obligation or lines of credit. It is basically calculated as the intrigued rate times the exceptional foremost sum of the obligation. Interest expense on the income statement represents interest accrued during the period covered by the financial statements, and not the amount of interest paid over that period. While interest expense is tax-deductible for companies, in an individual's case, it depends on their jurisdiction and also on the loan's purpose.

Learn more about Interest expense here

brainly.com/question/14185533

#SPJ4

6 0

1 year ago

The things that are most important to you are your top __________. A. niceties B. priorities C. peculiarities D. similarities

Svetlanka [38]

The things that are most important to you are your top priorities

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are the four components used to calculate Gross Domestic Product

sesenic [268]

<span>Personal consumption expenditures.Investment.Net exports.Government expenditure.</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Mercury Inc. purchased equipment in 2019 at a cost of $400,000. The equipment was expected to produce 700,000 units over the nex

Wittaler [7]

Answer:

See explanation section

Explanation:

We know,

Annual depreciation rate under Units-of-production = Depreciable amount/Overall (expected) production

Given,

Purchase value = $400,000

Residual value = $50,000

Expected production = 700,000 units

Depreciable Amount = $(400,000 - 50,000) = $350,000

Annual depreciation rate = $350,000/700,000

Depreciation rate = $0.50

Thrrefore, Accumulated depreciation from 2019 to 2021 = (100,000 + 160,000 + 80,000)*$0.50

= $170,000

We know, Book value of asset = Cost price - Accumulated depreciation

Book value = $400,000 - $170,000 = $230,000

Again, Loss on sale of equipment = Book value - Sales price

Loss on sale of equipment = $230,000 - $210,000

Loss on sale of equipment = $20,000

The journal entry to record the sale =

Debit Cash $210,000

Debit Accumulated Depreciation $170,000

Debit Loss on sale $20,000

Credit Equipment $400,000

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Suppose that out of the original 100 increase in government spending, 33 will be recycled back into purchases of domestically pr

serious [3.7K]

Answer:

Multiplier effect in the 4th round = 3.58

Explanation:

A change in aggregate demand can create a much greater impact in the equilibrium national income. This is known as the multiplier effect. This occurs when injections of new demand for goods and services into the circular flow of income creates further rounds of spending. For example, if the government spending was on building new affordable houses then the need for housing materials will create demand for wood, cement and other housing supplies. Thus, these businesses will see a rise in sales. Whilst they benefit through profits, their employees would benefit from wages and salaries. As their income rises, they will spend it in the economy, and so will the businesses from their profits. This additional rounds of spending is the multiplier effect.

If a 100 increase creates 33 for the second round, it is 33% (33/100 x 100) i.e. 100 x 33% = 33

This is proven since 33 x 33% = 10.89 in the third round.

Hence, the multiplier effect in the forth round = 10.89 x 33% = 3.58

7 0

3 years ago