Answer:
2. The change in expected height for every one additional centimeter of femur length.
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>1. The expected height for someone with a femur length of 65 centimeters.</u>
<em>Doesn't make sense, that would be height value when centimeters = 65.</em>
<u>2</u><u><em>. </em></u><u>The change in expected height for every one additional centimeter of femur length.</u>
<em>Makes sense, for every increase in one additional centimeter, we can expect the height to be proportional to the slope.</em>
<u>3. The femur length for someone with an expected height of 2.5 centimeters.</u>
<em>Doesn't make sense, the linear relationship relies on the femur length to get the height.</em>
<u>4. The change in expected femur length for every one additional centimeter of height.</u>
<em>Doesn't make sense, again, the linear relationship relies on the femur length.</em>
Answer:
D 36
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Write the information algebraically</em>
c = 3a
c + a = 48
c = children, a = adults
<em>In the second sentence (in bold), we can replace c with 3a</em>
c + a = 48 → 3a + a = 48
<em>Simplify</em>
3a + a = 48 → 4a = 48 → a = 12 (divide both sides by 4)
<em>We can then substitute or plug in a = 12 into the original equation:</em>
c + a = 48 → c + 12 = 48 → c = 36 (subtract 12 from both sides)
<h3>There are 36 children</h3>
I believe that the answer is c but if you wanted to make sure you could figure out the correlation on a graphing calculator.
Answer:
24 cm or h= 1/2 cm , b= 1 1/3 cm, l = 3cm
Step-by-step explanation:
3 x 4 x 2 = 12
Answer:
The formula 
Step-by-step explanation:
<em><u>Explanation</u></em>
Given W = x² - 2 y z
2 y z = x² + W
Dividing '2z' on both sides , we get
⇒
