Answer: Taste culture
Taste culture refers to a type of sucbulture in which individuals have a preference for a particular cultural service or product. People belonging to a taste culture share similar values and aesthetic preferences. For instance, individuals of the same taste culture might prefer the same sport, leisure activities and restaurants to eat at.
Answer:
World-systems theory (also known as world-systems analysis or the world-systems perspective)[1] is a multidisciplinary approach to world history and social change which emphasizes the world-system (and not nation states) as the primary (but not exclusive) unit of social analysis.[1] "World-system" refers to the inter-regional and transnational division of labor, which divides the world into core countries, semi-periphery countries, and the periphery countries.[2] Core countries focus on higher skill, capital-intensive production, and the rest of the world focuses on low-skill, labor-intensive production and extraction of raw materials.[3] This constantly reinforces the dominance of the core countries.[3] Nonetheless, the system has dynamic characteristics, in part as a result of revolutions in transport technology, and individual states can gain or lose their core (semi-periphery, periphery) status over time.[3] This structure is unified by the division of labour. It is a world-economy rooted in a capitalist economy.[4] For a time, certain countries become the world hegemon; during the last few centuries, as the world-system has extended geographically and intensified economically, this status has passed from the Netherlands, to the United Kingdom and (most recently) to the United States.[3]A world map of countries by their supposed trading status in 2000, using the world system differentiation into core countries (blue), semi-periphery countries (purple) and periphery countries (red). Based on the list in Dunn, Kawana, Brewer.
World-systems theory has been examined by many political theorists and sociologists to explain the reasons for the rise and fall of states, income inequality, social unrest, and imperialism.
Trust me mark me as brainliest trust me
Answer:
Yes, it is possible to achieve nationalist goals through peaceful movements.
Explanation:
Revolution refers to a significant, rapid overthrown of a political regime by the people using violent means. However, as society evolved to its current modern state there are more alternatives than to opt for revolution. Secondly, the violent methods of the revolution to achieve nationalistic goals are difficult to justify these days. The peaceful civil protests have seemed to be successful in recent times.
Ralph will "focus on the social advantages to smoking".
According to cognitive dissonance theory, there is an inclination for people to look for consistency among their perceptions (i.e., convictions, assessments). At the point when there is an irregularity between attitudes or practices, something must change to dispense with the dissonance. On account of an error amongst states of mind and conduct, it is doubtlessly that the disposition will change to oblige the conduct.
