If a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, is the outcome necessarily Pareto efficient if a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, then the outcome is not necessarily Pareto efficient this is because another change in the policy could cause another Pareto improvement.
A Pareto development is a development of a device whilst an alternative in the allocation of goods harms no person and advantages as a minimum one character. Pareto enhancements also are called "no-brainers" and are generally predicted to be rare, due to the plain and effective incentive to make any available Pareto development.
Factors that lie within the PPF display an inefficient or below-usage of resources – this is Pareto inefficient. A Pareto development way that output of both products can increase as we move from inside the PPF to factors at the PPF boundary.
Learn more about Pareto here:
brainly.com/question/7304310
#SPJ4
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
This theory is one of the theories of work and motivation as it pertains to certain workers. The theory is by Douglas MacGregor
These are the assumptions
1.that many people hate anything work and would do anything they can to avoid working.
2.people are not ambitious. They would rather avoid responsibility
3. People have to be forced to work, so they must be directed.
Answer:
Factors affecting the population growth of a country are:
Explanation:
The population growth of a country are determined by many factors from which some are mentioned below:
- CULTURAL ATTITUDE OF THE FAMILY: The attitude of the family towards population growth and their country plays a role in the population growth.
- GOVERNMENT POLICIES: lack of the government policies and planing results in the population growth of a country.
- COST OF EDUCATION: The higher the cost of education, the higher the illiteracy will be causing lack of education and awareness.
- AVAILABILITY OF CONTRACEPTION: Availability of the medical techniques to avoid the unwanted pregnancy helps in the controlling of the population growth of a country.
Answer:
Return n investment = 11.67%
Explanation:
Return on Investment is the proportion investment that is earned as operating income.
For the division, the return on investment would be the proportion of te investment in assets that is earned as net income.
This would be determined as follows;
Return n investment = (Net income÷ Operating assets) × 100
Return n investment = (175,000 ÷ 1,500,000) × 100= 11.67%
Return n investment = 11.67%
Answer:
B. 26,000, 24,000.
Explanation:
Stock Company
Equivalent units
Particulars Units % of Completion Equivalent Units
Mat. Conversion Mat. Conversion
Transferred Out 23000 100 100 23000 23000
<u>Ending WIP 3000 100 331/3% 3000 999.9= 1000</u>
<u>Total Equivalent units 26000 24000</u>
<u />
The Equivalent units can be calculated either by adding the units transferred out and ending WIP or by adding beginning WIP and units started.
Equivalent units for materials 26000
and Equivalent units for conversion are: 24000
