Answer:
Option C is the correct option.
Explanation:
As the rights and obligation of the antique rocking chair are been passed to third party, so the damage caused by the checque been bounced is the monetry consideration agreed between the party to the contract, McGraw and Tellis. So Tellis may recover money damages from McGraw. However there is a special condition that can allow Tellis recover his asset from Rio if the third party knew before purchase of this asset, that the checque paid to Tellis by McGraw was dishonoured but still he contracted with McGraw to acquire the antique rocking chair.
Overall the option C is the correct option with which the case scenario relates.
Traditional project management focuses on thorough planning up front. Such planning requires predictability.
The traditional project management is a practice which includes a set of developed techniques which are used in order for planning, execution, monitoring, closure, and estimating. Here the projects are run in a sequential cycle.
The planning which is done in traditional project management, this planning requires predictability. Thus, the predictability is considered an important factor here. A traditional project management focuses on upfront planning where factors like cost, scope, and time are given importance.
Hence, the entire project is planned upfront without any scope for changing requirements.
To learn more about traditional project management here:
brainly.com/question/28139249
#SPJ4
Answer:
C) $5,000
Explanation:
Since the price of the stocks first rose to $50, the account's equity was $50,000.
The SMA balance was = ($50,000 x 1/2) - $20,000 = $,5000
The SMA balance acts like a stabilizer and cannot be taken away even if the price of the stocks fall slightly. The price of stocks must fall 25% in order for the SMA to be withdrawn.
The investor's equity decreased = equity - margin requirement = $39,000 - $20,000 = $19,000, but the amount that the investor can borrow (SMA balance) will remain the same at $5,000.
Answer:
$1,000
Explanation:
For the computation of overhead over/under applied last year first we need to find out the applied overhead which is shown below:-
Applied overhead = Actual direct labor × Per direct labor
= 24,000 × $2
= $48,000
Over applied overhead = Applied overhead - Actual overhead
= $48,000 - $47,000
= $1,000
Therefore for computing the overhead over/under applied last year we simply applied the above formula.
