Hey mate
here is your answer :)
********************
The Dawes Act had a negative effect on American Indians, as it ended their communal holding of property (with crop land often being privately owned by families or clans), by which they had ensured that everyone had a home and a place in the tribe.
In both cultures, the basis of their economy was agriculture. But this was very difficult to carry out due to the geographical conditions in which they were. They were located in an area where the climate was very dry, the land was scarce and there was very little water to irrigate those lands. Both Chavin and Nazca solved this by using underground aqueducts to transport water and, therefore, irrigate the crops permanently. Then, the most important reason why they resorted to this mechanism is the lack of water to irrigate the crops.
Pro slavery advocates believed slave owners had a right to transport slaves into the territories; antislavery advocates argued that this gave slave holding settlers an unfair advantage over non-slave holding settlers.
Pro slavery advocates argued that the slave status of Kansas should be determined by popular vote; antislavery advocates argued that Kansas should be free because of its location north of the 36° 30' parallel.
Pro slavery advocates contended that free African Americans in Kansas should not be permitted rights under the state constitution; antislavery advocates argued that the federal constitution took precedence over Kansas’s state constitution.
Pro slavery advocates held that slavery in the state was legal, as established in the Missouri Compromise of 1820; antislavery advocates argued that this legislation was invalidated by the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Dred Scott case.
The holy bible believes that God is great, the creator of everything,and that his level of understanding is beyond human comprehension.
I hope this helps
