1) Lincoln was an intelligent young man, seeing as though he taught himself how to read a write, despite dropping out of school at a young age.
2) Lincoln said that the United States could prevent the spread of slavery into other states.
3) Lincoln could’ve used the word “country” instead.
4) The Emancipation Proclamation essentially said that slaves who were freed could now fight for the Union.
5) Lincoln expressed his determination, which is a heroic quality, by teaching himself how to read, write, and practice law. His dexterity is heroic.
Answer:
Explanation:
the regular administration of the law, according to which no citizen may be denied his or her legal rights and all laws must conform to fundamental, accepted legal principles, as the right of the accused to confront his or her accusers.
It’s pure entertainment and people love it and I don’t know
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
