Hello. You forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
A. It allows the author to show the length of time that went into the project. B. It allows the author to discuss the historical significance of this crew's mission. C. It allows the author to compare this crew's design to other crew's designs. D. It allows the author to show how the design progressed from start to finish.
Answer:
D. It allows the author to show how the design progressed from start to finish.
Explanation:
When the author of the text decides to use a chronological structure to tell the facts about the development of Apollo 11, he is establishing a timeline, where the reader will be able to follow the entire project and the progress he has made over time, that is, the reader will be able to know how the project was conceived, idealized, debated and put into practice. This gives a complete view of the project's progression from beginning to end, allowing the reader to project himself in this situation as if he also participated in the project.
The phrase best describes the overall purpose of the speech is option B. to comfort people who are upset about the Challenger disaster
<h3>What is Space Shuttle Challenger disaster?</h3>
Space Shuttle disaster happened when an American shuttle went into space but crashed.
The American president Ronald Reagan gave a speech to address the situation and to comfort the citizens about the loss of their dear ones.
Therefore, The phrase best describes the overall purpose of the speech is option B. to comfort people who are upset about the Challenger disaster.
Learn more on shuttle disaster below
brainly.com/question/1085461
#SPJ1
Well your asking "Can a question be a annotation" And the definition if annotation is "a note of explanation or comment added to a text or diagram." Now looking at that we see "explanation or comment" So in a way...It's more of a answer not a question...
<span>In his book Walden, a reflection on the act of living as simply as possible, Thoreau spoke at length on the impact of technology on our daily lives and humanity as a whole. He believed that technology was leading to a degradation of our relations with one another and with the natural world. He cited the construction of a telegraph line from Maine to Texas, saying,"We are in great haste to construct a magnetic telegraph line from Maine to Texas; but Maine and Texas, it may be, have nothing important to communicate." We can see them same in our modern day quest for the "next big thing"; snapping up the latest iPhone for hundreds of dollars, posting ever more on social media, with many having nothing important to contribute to a wider world despite access to that world at an unprecedented level. As a society, we have at our fingertips the lessons and work of all the world's great thinkers and scholars, and yet a great number of people use the potential at hand to watch funny cat videos. I believe that this is a sign of the degradation that Thoreau spoke of made manifest.</span>
