Answer:
Two(2) exemptions
Explanation:
The first exemption would be based on the fact that Ronald has health challenges while the second exemption would be on the basis of Ed's (his son) state of mental capability.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Since the contract did not mentioned any thing about the retuning of containers that were not defective, it becomes the obligation of the buyer to pay the final delivery amount on the basis of Good-faith modification.
Hence, option B is correct
Answer:
$6 per unit
Explanation:
using the weighted average method:
units completed 92,000 x 100% (both materials and conversion)
ending work in progress 24,000
- materials 90% completed = 21,600
- conversion 40% completed = 9,600
equivalent unit conversion costs = total conversion costs / total equivalent units of conversion
- total conversion costs = $20,320 + $15,240 + $$182,880 + $391,160 = $609,600
- total equivalent units of conversion = 92,000 + 9,600 = 101,600
equivalent unit conversion costs = $609,600 / 101,600 units = $6 per unit
Answer:
Option d would be the correct approach.
Explanation:
- The organized database of the important tasks required in carrying out a task that has been extrapolated from such a job description and used in job classification and assessment and personnel policies as well as positioning.
- This usually includes tasks, intent, obligations, nature including employment conditions of a position including the description of the position, as well as the identity or description of the individual the input data to.
Many examples do not apply to the subject being discussed. So option d is indeed the right one.
Amount invested in both schemes is $45,000
returns in investment g is 75,000 in 6 years.
yearly return is:
75000/6=12,500
returns in investment h is 105,000 in 9 years
yearly return is:
105,000/9
=11,666.67
from the above results we can conclude that investment g has the higher returns.