Answer:
The US Supreme Court’s decision fair and benevolent to Dred Scott and his family is described below in complete detail.
Explanation:
The Dred Scott judgment was the U.S. Supreme Court's judgment on March 6, 1857, that has existed in a free state and region did not authorize a slave character, Dred Scott, to his independence.
They dictated that African Americans, whether they were slaves or had parents who were slaves, had no constitutional avenue in court. They believed that the Missouri Compromise was illegal. In the cores of the court, Dred Scott had no constitutional right to demand his freedom.
Answer:
the athens overthrown the persians
Explanation:
Lincoln uses the metaphor of the wolf and the sheep to say that the Confederates had a different conception of freedom than those of the Union.
Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) was one of the most prominent politicians in the history of the United States who served as the 16th President of the United States of America. He was a tireless leader of the states of the Union during the Civil War.
He is known for making a metaphor regarding the concept of freedom that the Confederate states and the states of the Union had because he considered that the Confederate states, like a wolf, had a conception of freedom that violated the freedom of others ( the sheep).
According to the above, it can be inferred that Lincoln refers to the Confederate States as the wolves of the Civil War because they wanted to impose slavery without thinking about the rights of slaves, while the States of the Union were the sheep because they wanted to. freedom for all.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/12662880
In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause
of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution to create the Second Bank
of the United States and that the state of Maryland lacked the power to
tax the Bank. Arguably Chief Justice John Marshall's
finest opinion, McCulloch not only gave Congress broad discretionary
power to implement the enumerated powers, but also repudiated, in
ringing language, the radical states' rights arguments presented by
counsel for Maryland.
At issue in the case was the constitutionality of the act of Congress
chartering the Second Bank of the United States (BUS) in 1816. Although
the Bank was controlled by private stockholders, it was the depository
of federal funds. In addition, it had the authority to issue notes
that, along with the notes of states' banks, circulated as legal tender.
In return for its privileged position, the Bank agreed to loan the
federal government money in lieu of taxes. State banks looked on the
BUS as a competitor and resented its privileged position. When state
banks began to fail in the depression of 1818, they blamed their
troubles on the Bank. One such state was Maryland, which imposed a
hefty tax on "any bank not chartered within the state." The Bank of the
United States was the only bank not chartered within the state. When
the Bank's Baltimore branch refused to pay the tax, Maryland sued James
McCulloch, cashier of the branch, for collection of the debt. McCulloch
responded that the tax was unconstitutional. A state court ruled for
Maryland, and the court of appeals affirmed. McCulloch appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reviewed the case in 1819.
Elections
The fact that leaders get to contest in an election to win the mandate of the people so that they can lead ensures that they are responsive to their wishes. This is because voters will naturally elect people that are sympathetic to their issues
