Answer:
His marriage was not joyful from the beginning, by contrasts in insight and aspiration with his wife and by its accentuation on practicality over affection or love; Franklin was a virtuoso and required independence from ordinary imperatives.
Explanation:
Franklin was an incredible man researcher, publisher, political theorist, diplomat. However, we can't comprehend him completely without thinking about why he treated his wife so pitifully toward the finish of her life. The appropriate response isn't basic. However, a nearby perusing of Franklin's letters and distributed works, and a reconsideration of occasions encompassing his marriage, proposes another and frightfully thunderous clarification. It includes their solitary child's deadly sickness and a contradiction over vaccination.
They took on industrial jobs. When men left to go fight, their spots in the work force were empty, so women filled in. Women helped with the war effort form back home by joining the mainstream work force :)
Answer:
Considering these questions:
1. What if Napoleon had never been born? (In what ways would history have been different? Do you think someone else would have done what Napoleon did? Why?)
<em />
<em>a. If Napoleon was never born, someone else would have been born to undertake his roles but not in exact ways because nature abhors vacuum.</em>
<em>b. History would have been different because no two persons are the same and are created to perform exactly the same roles in nature. They might undertake similar ventures but not exactly the same at the given time.</em>
<em>
c. Yes someone else would have done what Napoleon did but in his own way. As earlier said no two persons are the same with the same mission. </em>
2. The French Revolution began as a struggle for the rights of the people against a single ruler with all the power. It ended by giving all power to another single ruler. Why do you think that happened?
Answer: It happened because the Public cannot be King, it is only a person that shall be given the people's mandate to lead the others. The only thing the people abhor or do not tolerate is high-handedness of a ruler not a leader. No leader is an absolute, that was why we should not allow too much power to be concentrated in an individual because of abuse. L<em>ord Acton said " Power corrupts but absolute Power corrupts absolutely."</em>
Which nation? I take it you mean the United States or Great Britain?
Because a few people, unless they invest their money into capital, can only buy so much. How do you justify the purchase of multi million dollar race horses. Who benefits from such a purchase?
How do you justify the purchase of a mansion with 12 bathrooms? Who needs such a place except a family of 13 children and 2 parents?
However, if they are conscientious and spend on capital and business interests, they put their wealth to work and and create jobs which helps many people.
Answer:
New York
Explanation:
Palatine immigrants settled in the Hudson Valley, bringing the legend of the Belsnickel with them.
