1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vladimir [108]
3 years ago
11

What are the "telling details of a piece of media

English
2 answers:
faltersainse [42]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Small pieces of information and visual scenes that tell audiences a lot about the story

Explanation:

answer for apex if ur looking for the question

What are the "telling details" in the news.

Varvara68 [4.7K]3 years ago
5 0
Telling details of a piece of media are small details that give a lot of information in a short amount of time
You might be interested in
15. What does Buck often dream of as he sleeps by the campfire? A. His fight with Spitz B. Primitive man C. Judge Miller's home
Bess [88]
I would say the correct answer is B. primitive man.
The point of the entire novel is that Buck is fighting his urges to go to the wilderness and succumb to his wild identity of a wolf. Thus, dreaming about the primitive man clearly portrays his struggle between his two identities, that of a domesticated dog and that of a wild wolf. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a central idea in "Flood Myths From Around the World"?
ella [17]

answer: Ancient flood myths gave audiences a positive way of understanding their place in the world as a new creation brought out of destruction.

Explanation:

i took the test :)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which passage most clearly uses internal first person?
andreev551 [17]

Answer:

I sat down across from the lawyer, who put his feet up on his desk

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If the President of the United States were accused of accepting bribes while in office what power does Congress have to bring ch
Y_Kistochka [10]

The United States Constitution provides that the House of Representatives "shall have the sole Power of Impeachment" ( Article I, section 2 ) and that "the Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments…[but] no person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present" ( Article I, section 3 ). The president, vice president, and all civil officers of the United States are subject to impeachment.

The concept of impeachment originated in England and was adopted by many of the American colonial governments and state constitutions. As adopted by the framers, this congressional power is a fundamental component of the constitutional system of “checks and balances.” Through the impeachment process, Congress charges and then tries an official of the federal government for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” The definition of “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” was not specified in the Constitution and has long been subject to debate.

In impeachment proceedings, the House of Representatives charges an official of the federal government by approving, by majority vote, articles of impeachment. A committee of representatives, called “managers,” acts as prosecutors before the Senate. The Senate sits as a High Court of Impeachment in which senators consider evidence, hear witnesses, and vote to acquit or convict the impeached official. In the case of presidential impeachment trials, the chief justice of the United States presides. The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office. In some cases, the Senate has also disqualified such officials from holding public offices in the future. There is no appeal. Since 1789, about half of Senate impeachment trials have resulted in conviction and removal from office.

Historical Development

In The Federalist , No. 65, Alexander Hamilton wrote that impeachment is "a method of national inquest into the conduct of public men" accused of violating the “public trust.” Hamilton and his colleagues at the Constitutional Convention knew that the history of impeachment as a constitutional process dated from 14th-century England, when the fledgling Parliament sought to make the king's advisers accountable. By the mid-15th century, impeachment had fallen into disuse in England, but in the early 17th century, the excesses of the English kings prompted Parliament to revive its impeachment power. Even as the Constitution's framers toiled in Philadelphia in 1787, the impeachment trial of British official Warren Hastings was in progress in London and avidly followed in America. Hastings, who was eventually acquitted, was charged with oppression, bribery, and fraud as colonial administrator and first governor-general in India

The American colonial governments and early state constitutions followed the British pattern of trial before the upper legislative body on charges brought by the lower house. Despite these precedents, a major controversy arose at the Constitutional Convention about whether the Senate should act as the court of impeachment. Opposing that role for the Senate, James Madison and Charles Cotesworth Pinckney asserted that it would make the president too dependent on the legislative branch. They suggested, as alternative trial bodies, the Supreme Court or the chief justices of the state supreme courts. Hamilton and others argued, however, that such bodies would be too small and susceptible to corruption. In the end, after much wrangling, the framers selected the Senate as the trial forum. To Hamilton fell the task of explaining the convention's decision. In The Federalist , No. 65, he argued:

The Convention thought the Senate the most fit depository of this important trust. Where else than in the Senate could have been found a tribunal sufficiently dignified, or sufficiently independent? What other body would be likely to feel confidence enough in its own situation, to preserve unawed and uninfluenced the necessary impartiality between an individual accused, and the representatives of the people, his accusers?

There was also considerable debate at the convention in Philadelphia over the definition of impeachable crimes. In the early proposals, the president and other officials could be removed on impeachment and conviction for "corrupt conduct," or for "malpractice or neglect of duty." Later, the wording was changed to "treason, bribery, or corruption," and then to "treason or bribery" alone. Contending that "treason or bribery" was too narrow a definition, George Mason proposed adding "mal-administration" but switched to "other high crimes and misdemeanors against the state" when Madison commented that "mal-administration" was too broad. A final revision defined impeachable offenses as "treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors."

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does anyone know a malaprop for school?(malaprop is the mistaken use of a word ex: he will dissolve a mystery)
Mariulka [41]

Answer:

Wow, he is so school!

Explanation:

In this sentence school is used instead of the word cool, making it a malapropism.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Identify the italicized part of the sentence. Mike rode his motorcycle on the dirt track. subject predicate direct object indire
    13·1 answer
  • Reporter's Notebook Part Two–Lesson 02.02 Writing a Lead
    9·1 answer
  • The aggressive preparation of war, was growing along with nations armies
    11·1 answer
  • "In this crisis I hope I may be pardoned if I do not address the House at any length today. I hope that any of my friends and co
    6·2 answers
  • Why must narratives be presented in a logical sequence ?
    6·1 answer
  • _____ is when an event or action seems ridiculously out of place within a story. A) Hyperbole B) Incongruity C)Irony D) Sarcasm
    10·1 answer
  • The lasagna was made as a joint effort by my two brothers.
    8·2 answers
  • If you know that lions are dangerous to people, and you read that lions are losing habitat due to human settlements, what infere
    10·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer. (No links please.)
    5·2 answers
  • What conclusion can readers draw about the general based on a visualization of the excerpt?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!