Looks like the given curve is
5<em>xy</em> + <em>z</em>⁴<em>x</em> - 3<em>yz</em> = 3
Differentiate both sides with respect to <em>x</em> :
5<em>y</em> + 4<em>z</em>³<em>x</em> ∂<em>z</em>/∂<em>x</em> + <em>z</em>⁴ - 3<em>y</em> ∂<em>z</em>/∂<em>x</em> = 0
Solve for ∂<em>z</em>/∂<em>x</em> :
(4<em>z</em>³<em>x</em> - 3<em>y</em>) ∂<em>z</em>/∂<em>x</em> = - (5<em>y</em> + <em>z</em>⁴)
∂<em>z</em>/∂<em>x</em> = - (5<em>y</em> + <em>z</em>⁴) / (4<em>z</em>³<em>x</em> - 3<em>y</em>)
At the point (1, 1, 1), this derivative is
∂<em>z</em>/∂<em>x</em> (1, 1, 1) = - (5 + 1) / (4 - 3) = -6
Okay so if the pan is 12 inches wide you can divided 3 inches by that and get 4. Then do the same thing for the length, 18, and you get 6. Multiply 6 by 4 to get the number of brownies Pablo cut.
You can check my answer by drawing a box on a piece of paper, and drawing little boxes inside. Keep in mind that each brownie is 1 unit, or 3 inches.
Answer:
-1/3 or -2/6
Step-by-step explanation:
First, you pick two points, I did (-5,10) and (1,8). Then, because slope is y(2)-y(1)/ x(2)-x(1), the equation would be 8-10/1-(-5) which equals -2/6 which simplifies into -1/3.
(hope this helps!)
Answer:
Yes, the test was conducted with a risk of a type I error.
Step-by-step explanation:
If we reject the null hypothesis, does this mean that we have proved it to be false beyond all doubt? Explain your answer.
Yes, for a null hypothesis to be rejected, it has being proven beyond all doubt that the null hypothesis will not work. the normal distribution has being used for the probability calculation.
if the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted, a type I error as occur.
In general terms:
‘a hypothesis has been rejected when it should have been accepted’. When this occurs, it is called a type I error.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
All angles in a triangle add up to 180º, so we can make this equation.
7x-2+5x-10+4x=180
Combine like terms
16x-12=180
Add 12
16x=168
Divide
x=16.5