I think its C. they staged a counter-demonstration. I may be wrong.
The United States’ approach to foreign policy had not change conceptually from the days it signed its independence. These ideas were primarily based on protecting US interests overseas and restricting foreign influences in the Americas. Once they furthered themselves politically and
economically, they gained the status of being a world power and they still wanted more. They figured they had to strengthen the country industrially as they needed worldwide markets for its growing industrial and agricultural
surpluses as well as sources of raw materials for manufacturing. They could only achieve these foreign markets with more concentrated efforts on its foreign policy as America was principally guided by economic motives.
The internal economic growth of the United States made them want to look outward for foreign markets. Export earnings increased from 450 million to over a billion from 1870 to the early 1890’s. US business’s were soon
overpowering foreign competition as even American steelmakers could easily compete with any British producer in the world. Everything seemed to be inciting the US to expand abroad. Expansionists throughout America emphasized the resources of what other lands could provide and the wealth that could result from their establishment. For example, Cuba offered an abundance of sugar
plantations and land in Panama would offer America control of the canal.
The economic benefits of a foreign land can be seen through an example of Americans exploring the distant islands of Hawaii. During the course of the early 1800s, missionaries from America traversed on a laborious voyage to Hawaii and ended up settling there. They offered accounts of incredible economic opportunities and possibilities in the Hawaiian islands. Consequently, other Americans proceeded to Hawaii to become sugar planters and to establish lucrative businesses.
Keeping Communism from spreading beyond the countries already under it's influence
Answer:
Arnold was killed and Montgomery was wounded in the seize of Quebec.
Explanation:
During the Battle of Quebec, on 31st of December 31, 1775, Colonel Benedict Arnold and General Richard Montgomery failed the capture Quebec.
<u>In the process of Quebec seizure, Montgomery was killed, and Arnold was wounded</u> (he later died in 1801.) The option placed here suggests it was another way around, which is why it isn't true.
During the war, the British army did gain control of Canada and it is considered to be one of the biggest losses of the American army in history.
Answer:
political philosophy of Mauryan empire.prevalent was the theory of matsyanyaya, which proposes that in periods of chaos, when there is no ruler, the strong ...
Explanation:
