1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lemur [1.5K]
3 years ago
12

10.725 divided by 1.3 (long division check work)

Mathematics
1 answer:
OLga [1]3 years ago
5 0
The answer is 8.25... Sorry if I get it wrong.


You might be interested in
I am a number between 1 and 50. I am composite. I have 10 factors. My ones digit is a 6. What number am i
quester [9]
The number is 36 because 1,2,3,4,6,9,12,16,24,36 and that is 10 factors
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is the graph of the linear equality 2x-3y<12
WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

The graph below shows the answer to

2x - 3y < 12

Also shown as

-3y < -2x + 12

Step-by-step explanation:

You can rearrange the inequality by subtracting 2x from both sides to isolate the y.

You now have -3y < 12 -2x

which can be put into the standard linear equation form of

-3y < -2x + 12

Then you divide both sides by -3 to get singular value of y, which is something like

-3/-3y < -2/-3x + 12/-3

which is

y > 2/3x -4

Note: I switched direction of the inequality because you are dividing both sides by a negative value.

7 0
3 years ago
An element with mass 970 grams decays by 27.7% per minute. How much of the element is remaining after 13 minutes, to the nearest
Mnenie [13.5K]
Basically, 27.7% of 970 is 268.69 grams, if 13 minutes so i’m pretty sure it’s 268.69 X 13 = 3492.97, it cannot be deduced from 970 unless it became −2522.97, is that the answer ur looking for?
6 0
3 years ago
A teacher asks his students to write the numbers shown in order from least to greatest. Paul thinks the numberss are already in
Sergeu [11.5K]
What are the numbers? 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
From 1960 to 2010, a certain money stock measure was growing at the rate of approximately 43e(1/2)x billion dollars per decade,
natulia [17]

Answer:

1222 billion dollars.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the total increase from 1960 to 2010, we need to find the growth of each decade and sum them all:

In the period 1960-1970, we have x = 1, and the growth is:

y(1) = 43e(1/2) = 70.895

In the period 1970-1980, we have x = 2, and the growth is:

y(2) = 43e(2/2) = 116.8861

The growth in the following 3 periods are:

y(3) = 43e(3/2) =192.7126

y(4) = 43e(4/2) = 317.7294

y(5) = 43e(5/2) =523.8472

So the total growth in the period 1960 - 2010 is:

Total = y(1) + y(2) + y(3) + y(4) + y(5)

Total = 70.895 + 116.8861+192.726+317.7294+523.8472

Total = 1222.08\ billion\ dollars

Rounding to the nearest billion dollars, we have a total of 1222 billion dollars.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the slope of the line that passes through (3,-5) and (-7,15)
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following would be the best example of parallel lines in the real world?
    8·2 answers
  • if 2 + sqrt(3) is a polynomial root, name another root of the polynomial, and explain how you know it must also be a root
    9·2 answers
  • I need help in #3 and 4
    13·2 answers
  • Based on the family the graph below belongs to, which equation could represent the graph? image below.
    9·1 answer
  • Write the equation of a line in slope intercept form that contains the points (2,4) and (4,12)​
    13·2 answers
  • -3x+3y=9 2x−7y=−14 ​
    13·1 answer
  • The poetry club had its first bake sale, and they made $79.35. The club members are planning to have
    6·2 answers
  • I have a question please answer it.
    5·2 answers
  • PLS HELPPP WHAT IS THE ANSWER???
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!