Answer:
Question 1: Does an art object have to serve a function to be art?
This type of question needs an answer from the one reading the question. However, I feel that an art object doesn't have to serve a function to be art. because art should speak for itself.
Question 2: Are art objects valuable in themselves, without any functions?
Art objects need to operate in some way all art exists for a cause and these motivations make up the functions of art.
Explanation:
I hope this helps, L.E.
You haven’t given any clues. There’s not a good chance to get this right with the information you’ve given
They are survial tools. For example, the fire is used for warmth and for her bow and arrow when shooting. Another example is the water she uses it to hide and escape quickly during the beginning of the game or uses it as a source of thirst. A final example is the trees she uses them as a way to climb up and scope out the area of where she can go or hide from other players
Answer:
defeated
Explanation:
The sentence is talking about competition between two teams hence only two words can suitably answer the question, victory and defeat.
Since the sentence says about last year winner and speaker tries to express some accomplishment by laying emphasis on winner adjective for opponent. It clearly suggest that they got better of a competitive team.
Hence defeated is the most suitable answer to this question.
