<span>When it comes to limiting rights, the usual formulation is that fundamental rights should be abridged only for compelling reasons. Most of the time, this is because people's fundamental rights, or claims of fundamental rights, collide. We have freedom of religion—which flows from the freedom of self-determination. However, we would permissibly prohibit the exercise of a religion which demands human sacrifice. The victim's right to life trumps the perpetrator's freedom to worship. Freedom to contract is sometimes abridged to preclude unfair trade practices. We've somewhat arbitrarily defined various "fundamental rights" in our constitutional law. Lesser rights may be abridged for lesser reasons, with a social consensus (as reflected in legislation) about a value. Freedom to get intoxicated may be abridged for the public order (which might be characterized as other people's freedom to be left alone by drunks).</span>
Information social influence is the vehicle by which women learn what is attractive, whereas, normative social influence explains women's attempts to create the ideal body.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Women tend to be inclined more towards looking attractive as they unconsciously perceive it as a sign of well-being and standard living.
The sources that women learn from about attractiveness also influence them to a great extent and tend them to imitate the source by developing themselves to look attractive.
Natural law refers to a body of principles and rules imposed on individuals by some extra-human power. An example of this is tje fat that in the past kings were believed to have a right to their crown because of some divine right gave them by God, and so everyone had to adapt to those pricniples without possibilities of change.
