I would say that authors showing preference is bias
Answer:
C. Because it was raining heavily, Monika arrived at her doctor's appointment fifteen minutes late.
Explanation:
If we want to express a causal relation, or that one event is the cause and the other its consequence, we need to use causal or consequential dependent clauses.
Leaving this sentence unchanged or revising it to the answer D, the reader might accnowledge these two events (raining and Monica's tardiness) as two independent, unrelated events.
Answer B. suggests that Monica rained heavily which is, of course, completely illogical and is an example of a misplaced modifier.
Only answer C. provides correlation between these two events. Connector "because" suggests that the rain was the cause of Monica being late
Hello.
Why anyone would want an advantage for this, I don't know. It's nearly impossible to figure out any. Yet, I did. You're welcome.
Advantages:
✯ Everything would be harmonious, whether it be bad or good.
✯There would be no such thing as, "picky people."
✯There would be no arguments over social issues.
Disadvantages:
✯There would not be any variety that shapes communities.
✯Opinions would be virtually nonexistent.
✯Individuals would be prone to be controlled.
✯People's beliefs would be so similar that they'd become facts to them.
Answer:
This is in the APM test, stop cheating.
Explanation:
Use your brains, I know you have one.
I think its D beause it seems to be the only that looks right to me