The Nuremberg & Tokyo Trials (IMTFE) were both held purposely for charging Axis leadership with war crimes.
The Nuremberg Trials primarily dealt with the Holocaust crimes and war waging from Nazi Germany.
Whereas the International Military Tribunal for the Far East or Tokyo Trials, were for the crimes the Japanese for starting and waging the war in the Pacific as well as the crimes the Japanese perpetrated on POW’s and civilian internees from their occupation of China.
Both trials established permanent principles, guidelines, and ethic laws regarding war crimes.
a)
The main claim of the passage is that, by implementing Prohibition, the United States took a step that was much more extreme and permanent than any of those that had been taken in other industrialized nations in connection with alcohol. The evidence that supports this argument is the fact that such legislation was included in the Constitution and in federal law.
b)
A piece of evidence that would help support the argument in the excerpt would be a list of measures that other countries took in respect to the topic of alcohol consumption. This would allow us to compare different measures between countries more easily.
c)
One way in which the process discussed in the passage compares with earlier reform movements is in the relentlessness and tirelessness of the people who encouraged reform. Both reform movements attempted to achieve great goals, and to influence federal legislation permanently.
All I know is that slaves were treated in a unruly matter which they did not have the rights to do many things that they felt were needed hope this helped solve part of your answer
Answer:
Calonne
Explanation:
As a last resort, Calonne proposed to the king the suppression of internal customs duties and argued in favor of the taxation of the property of nobles and clergy.Under the pressure of the opposition, Louis XVI dismissed Calonne in 1787 and exiled him to Lorraine.
